K
kalelisback
Enthusiast
Silver Level
What's a better bluff in the following scenario?
Let's say you put your opponent on a hand like AQ and the call their middle position raise from the BB with a hand like 76s . If the board come J 5 2 rainbow, is it better to lead out bluff knowing your opponent didn't hit or is it better to check-raise them (because they will almost always make a cbet if you check)?
I feel check-raise is a stronger play but it commits a lot more chips if you're wrong (where as if a lead bet is called, you commit a lot less chips and may choose to shut down if called on the flop)
Interested to know your thoughts in these types of situations.
Let's say you put your opponent on a hand like AQ and the call their middle position raise from the BB with a hand like 76s . If the board come J 5 2 rainbow, is it better to lead out bluff knowing your opponent didn't hit or is it better to check-raise them (because they will almost always make a cbet if you check)?
I feel check-raise is a stronger play but it commits a lot more chips if you're wrong (where as if a lead bet is called, you commit a lot less chips and may choose to shut down if called on the flop)
Interested to know your thoughts in these types of situations.
Last edited: