N.D.
Visionary
Silver Level
How is a conservative opponent more profitable than a loose one? Please explain. Since average means mediocre, I've translated your post to mean "Average players who are semi-tight, passive, and predictable are the most profitable opponents to face". If I'm wrong, tell me how.
But if loose aggressive players can't wait to pay me off when I've got the nuts, they're way more profitable than any kind of tight player.
And if loose passive players can't read the board and want to pay me off, aren't they most profitable?
Furthermore, isn't the key component to your statement that the opponent's predictable?
Even loose aggressive players have patterns. Loose passive players can have them too. It's the patterns that make them predictable and so a loose player should be most profitable since they spew the maximum amount of chips in the minimum amount of time.
A semi-tight passive player takes quite a bit of coaxing. And after all that coaxing you don't get as much as you would if they were loose.
But if loose aggressive players can't wait to pay me off when I've got the nuts, they're way more profitable than any kind of tight player.
And if loose passive players can't read the board and want to pay me off, aren't they most profitable?
Furthermore, isn't the key component to your statement that the opponent's predictable?
Even loose aggressive players have patterns. Loose passive players can have them too. It's the patterns that make them predictable and so a loose player should be most profitable since they spew the maximum amount of chips in the minimum amount of time.
A semi-tight passive player takes quite a bit of coaxing. And after all that coaxing you don't get as much as you would if they were loose.