Can poker stop the war ?

[Serjo600]

poker players are not pacifists, especially those who have been playing for a long time, there are so greedy players that even under the best conditions you will lose if you play at the same table with such a character, and if there are 3-4 of them, it will not be profitable at all.:star::star::star:

 

[mariuspoker1]

if only we can force fighting parts at hot spots to sit at the poker table and to solve the reasons for which the conflicts began in the game...
then poker would become a game of peace throughout the world.
diplomacy has ceased to be capable of resolving conflicts.so can humanity try alternative ways to get out of the wars ...
What do u think?
...---...

If i understood well you believe that by bringing the people who starts wars at a poker table they ll solve their conflicts between them that way ll be peace in the world ...how come your mind thought at such a stupid idea???

 

[diego farfan]

beautiful thinking because any way to resolve a conflict for peace is something beautiful because it avoids many losses that contract to the suffering of many people and it would be something beautiful that through the game you can solve controversies instead of force

 

[najjah166]

which report ?

 

[ZenGreen]

except the rich would have the RNG so rigged youd never win, it would be just gerrymandering except youre always getting the cold deck LOL

 

[cwdignus]

to the winner the potatoes ... "Suppose you a field of potatoes and two hungry tribes. The potatoes only come to feed one of the tribes that thus acquires the strength to cross the mountain and to go to the other slope, where there are potatoes in abundance; but if the two tribes share the potatoes of the country in peace, they do not sufficiently nourish themselves and die of starvation. Peace in this case is destruction; war is conservation. One of the tribes exterminates the other and collects the spoils. Hence the joy of victory, the hymns, acclaims, public rewards and all the other deeds of warfare. If war were not so, such demonstrations would not take place, for the real reason that man only celebrates and loves what is pleasurable or advantageous to him, and for the rational reason that no person canonizes an action that virtually destroys it . To the vanquished, hatred or compassion; to the winner, the potatoes. "

 

[dcproster]

After bad beat president will throw atomic bomb to insulters country.

 

[xpvictor1]

Haves and have nots ..

There are those that have and those that do not have. Man wants what others have and those who have, don't all want to share. For this reason alone man will always war. Another problem is that most people are not willing to let others have their own opinions and ideals. They want everyone to believe how they believe and will fight to this end. For just these 2 reasons man will always be at war.

 

[Sereny33]

Poker is money, money is evil, evil and there is a war of good with this evil, in the end mutual responsibility

 

[fa1920]

That you have to stop smoking illegal things and keep playing poker

 

[Pokericon08]

Wouldn't it be a beautiful world if wars were settled by sport rather than murder and blood. I have never understood how body counts resolved disputes between nations. Guess it's really all about population control.

 

[NeZlo4]

if only we can force fighting parts at hot spots to sit at the poker table and to solve the reasons for which the conflicts began in the game...
then poker would become a game of peace throughout the world.
diplomacy has ceased to be capable of resolving conflicts.so can humanity try alternative ways to get out of the wars ...
What do u think?
...---...

Capitalism- > fascism - > war.
Poker treat capitalism, too, that and a hungry wolf reassure a piece of biscuits.