D
DS3
Legend
Loyaler
I think most smart players get beyond the point of dissecting this too much -there really is no point. Any decent player will know what they should be doing at the table - and by this I mean decent players must number a few hundred thousand around the world, possibly a lot more.
But, you could have Phil Galfond's skill set, and if you run bad you will lose a session or a tourney -there is only so much creative play/bluffing any individual could get away with.
So, for a player to prosper in a session he or she needs goods hands to play. That is luck. The player then needs to capitalize on such luck and maximize profit. Luck and skill are inseparable in poker. People often attempt to state poker is all skill- that of course is so much nonsense. However, it obviously does take skill to navigate around all the pitfalls.
People can say its skill vs luck 50/50, 60/40, 70/30...but I simply do not really bother with such breakdowns anymore. Just watch a tournament through to conclusion and invariably the winner, a world class player, will note first and foremost that they ran well...
But, you could have Phil Galfond's skill set, and if you run bad you will lose a session or a tourney -there is only so much creative play/bluffing any individual could get away with.
So, for a player to prosper in a session he or she needs goods hands to play. That is luck. The player then needs to capitalize on such luck and maximize profit. Luck and skill are inseparable in poker. People often attempt to state poker is all skill- that of course is so much nonsense. However, it obviously does take skill to navigate around all the pitfalls.
People can say its skill vs luck 50/50, 60/40, 70/30...but I simply do not really bother with such breakdowns anymore. Just watch a tournament through to conclusion and invariably the winner, a world class player, will note first and foremost that they ran well...