Lheticus
Legend
Silver Level
I thought this was going to be in line with like views of Dan Colman and many others who like the fact that they're good at this "game" and that it has made them rich, but dislike the fact that they're literally taking money from other people to accomplish this.
THAT'S the moral dilemna, if there is one.
That was actually the point. I'm surprised you missed it. He gave TWO interviews. The first he called himself an immoral human being and the opposite of a role model or ambassador for the game. The 2nd interview was when he won Kara Scott had to basically beg him to say a couple words and it was very brief and meaningless. He didn't even seem happy. Like more glad to have bested Negreanu head's up than he was that he just took home like 20m.
Generically speaking, people who play poker, in casinos or online, for real money, are understood to know the risks that come with wagering money, on games with a large skill component or otherwise. It is the responsibility of every poker player to avoid taking money from those who are not equipped to take those risks, i.e. the addicted, who wager more than they can afford, and the underaged, who are not considered to be mature enough and perhaps even wager money online that is not their own.
Otherwise, you know the risks, you know you can lose, and you know what you can lose. By putting your chips on the table anyway, you accept these conditions. There is nothing immoral about winning money via poker from someone for whom this is the case.