March prop bet for hands played, winrate

[blankoblanco]

I actually think you're lazier than Combuboom

how DARE you

 

[switch0723]

ill lay $200 to your $150 for 60k hands, (and you are allowed to keep grinding past 60k if you havn't got the winrate high enough)

 

[WVHillbilly]

You can certainly keep playing beyond 60K as far as I'm concerned to reach the winrate required. I wonder how much I would have to pay Jared to tell you to play less???

 

[WVHillbilly]

how DARE you

It's not that I don't think you're lazy, you are. I just think Chuck's got you covered plus he's playing 6-max and going for more hands. Wait you're right, that's way too ambitious, I take it back Combu is the laziest!!

 

[ChuckTs]

I'm not completely opposed to 4:3. Mainly because i forgot to mention that I've been practicing 8-tabling and feel surprisingly comfortable, even though I've been running like shit lately.

Even so, that's about 3.6 hours/day for me assuming I'm busy with Oma. That sounds both terrifying and exciting.

 

[WVHillbilly]

I'm not completely opposed to 4:3. Mainly because i forgot to mention that I've been practicing 8-tabling and feel surprisingly comfortable, even though I've been running like shit lately.

Even so, that's about 3.6 hours/day for me assuming I'm busy with Oma. That sounds both terrifying and exciting.

Hmmm 8-tabling huh? When are you planning on setting the exact terms? $100:$75 is, of course, also good for me.

 

[ChuckTs]

Keep in mind my tilt problem (which is in the process of getting fixed but will never disappear). When I tilt 8-tabling, the affect on my winrate is doubled vs when I play 4 tables of course.

4:3 is ok, but 2:1 is of course better for me

OR we could even do what icemonkey suggested (or what I think he suggested) which is setting different odds for different landmarks, so to speak. That could of course change the winrate condition from any # of hands to strictly within the specific hand # landmarks.