If I have a tough decision, I prefer to be patient and wait rather than choose the all-in decision... however, I'm not certain this is the ideal approach. It seems like many good players that I follow and listen to on podcasts, etc., they seem to take the opposite approach - when in doubt, shove. LOL I listened to one pro just the other day on a podcast and that's exactly what he said - he prefers to make the aggressive move and shove rather than take the passive route and fold... and the reason he gave is that if he goes all-in and loses, well he can still analyze the play later and learn a valuable lesson from it. If he folds, then quite often you never see a showdown and you never see what hand your opponent held... so you don't get the same sort of lesson afterwards when you analyze your play during a study session. It's something for all of us to ponder, it's a very good point, especially since most good poker players will tell you it is much better to be aggressive rather than sit and wait for the best spots before shoving. You simply have to realize and accept the fact that being aggressive means you are taking a much higher-variance route to success. You might look silly sometimes when it doesn't work out, so you have to be okay with that - it's just part of this game we all love, accepting failure when it happens to us.