just played a session of about 300 hands so now have only 5.5k hands on Carbon 4nl. pretty boring session somewhat and not a ton of spots but there is a few
Merge - $0.04 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 4 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 3
Hero (BTN): $4.00
SB: $4.00
BB: $3.91
UTG: $10.35
SB posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.04
Pre Flop: ($0.06) Hero has J♥ K♣
UTG calls $0.04, Hero raises to $0.16, fold, fold, UTG calls $0.12
Flop: ($0.38, 2 players) J♠ 5♠ A♣
UTG checks, Hero bets $0.25, UTG calls $0.25
Turn: ($0.88, 2 players) 4♦
UTG checks, Hero bets $0.58, UTG calls $0.58
River: ($2.04, 2 players) 3♦
UTG checks, Hero checks
villain is 56/11. figured betting flop and turn to get value from Jx and draws and then check river cause i dont see much continuing with. thoughts?
Merge - $0.04 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 3
Hero (BB): $4.00
UTG: $4.00
MP: $4.00
CO: $3.85
BTN: $4.50
SB: $6.75
SB posts SB $0.02, Hero posts BB $0.04
Pre Flop: ($0.06) Hero has A♣ T♣
fold, fold, fold, fold, SB calls $0.02, Hero raises to $0.16, SB calls $0.12
Flop: ($0.32, 2 players) A♥ 8♣ 4♠
SB checks, Hero bets $0.21, SB calls $0.21
Turn: ($0.74, 2 players) Q♠
SB checks, Hero checks
River: ($0.74, 2 players) T♥
SB bets $0.37, Hero raises to $1.14, SB raises to $6.38 and is all-in, Hero calls $2.49 and is all-in
honestly dont know wat was going on here
bet turn obv and this hand is much easier. as played fold to river 3bet
Edit: why when i put "Absolute Poker" it turns into Absolute Poker?
Same villain if I remember correctly. If not I no it was a fish. Normally donks aren't 3bet shoving rivers with air but because we have 2 pair I'm not quite sure about calling the shove
I agree, its a tough fold as you have 2 pair, but against passisve donks it is probably a correct fold as we will go to showdown against hands which beat us most of the time here. Unless we have a read that villain will stack off light post-flop. Tbh in game i would probs make a crying call cos i suck
For the first hand its pretty standard, second hand I think if its the 56/10 guy then you definately want to fire twice, but vs a solid or even average reg checking behind is a good play as well. The river depends solely on reads, if you think he can do that with 2p then call, if its only sets or straights then you have to fold.. Generally I think calling is okay
I think in both of those cases villain hit the flop hard, and you were probably right to fold. That overbet on the second hand, was he just concerned about you hanging around and getting the flush on the cheap?
What's with getting to see that river card after you folded? I've never seen that before.
Ugh I hate both of those spots, I think in the first hand you are ahead of his range, but he has position so I think he is going to earn more money if you continue folding is probably fine, I also think you will take it down ALOT if you raise to about 1.20, depending on whether he will be folding 2s-9s or even over cards, overall I think vs an unknown a fold is fine.
Second hand I think you want to raise his flop bet for value from overcards, flush draws, straight draws etc, if he 3bets the flop then its an obv fold and if he shows any more agression down the line you can fold..
How you mean? 55 and 88 raise and call a 3bet here no?Hand 1 - the fact that he raised pre confuses me
I'm not that sure we don't have any FE, I see some people doing this kind of huge overraise type thing when they put you on collecting the 'dead money'. You're probably right though, he mostly has a hand I guess.Hand 2 - I get it in but its marginal for sure, I don't think we have any fold equity btw
good responses but still not sure that we have no FE in Hand2
Fair enough, so what kinda range do you give villain that raises your psb 6x in an unraised pot?
if you think we have no FE why would you get it in with this hand? Would you do it if he showed you a set or a flopped straight and told you he wasn't folding?Hand 2 - I get it in but its marginal for sure, I don't think we have any fold equity btw
So I just stoved a range and I am surprised with the outcome.
I think his range is super wide for sure so that has to include the flopped straights, sets, 2 pair hands and some combo draws.
97,TT,88,66,T8,T6,86 are deff possibilities.
T9,T7,T6,96,98,87,76,77,99 and some random Tx hands and pretty much a lot of FDs too. If we can assume they would raise all pp>TT and big AJd+ hands then we can discount those.
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 53.237% 52.44% 00.79% 46728 706.00 { { TT-66, ATs, Ad9d, Ad7d, Ad5d, Ad4d, Ad3d, Ad2d, KdJd, KTs, Kd9d, QdJd, QTs, Qd9d, JTs, Jd9d, T6s+, 96s+, 86s+, 76s, ATo, KTo, QTo, JTo, T6o+, 96o+, 86o+, 76o }
Hand 1: 46.763% 45.97% 00.79% 40960 706.00 { Qd7d }
VS this super wide range we actually have decent equity. What do you think about that range?
EDIT: I just noticed that I left out some worse FDs and some total air hands. It added about 3% to our equity.