In order to win we got to beat all other two cards combos under KKings and all other AKings as well. Here is how is done.
AK suited or unsuited is the strongest no-pair hand in No Limit Hold’em. It holds very good equity against all hands if we can see all five cards. If we hold 22 to QQ is 46%, up against KK is 30%, up against AA we have 8% and against anything else we have a huge advantage. Therefore, AK can be played really strong as it performs well against every hand except AA/KK and we hold a blocker to even that and cut all AA or KK combos in half.
A great majority of live No Limit Hold'em players (California and Las Vegas) even winning players play AK far too weakly. Most of them think the AK is a drawing hand, therefore they only call raises to hit the flop or fold after the flop if they missed. Playing AK this way guaranty the lowest earn possible for the hand. The lack of reciprocal edge by playing AK softly alone demonstrates why we should no play AK softly. If we play AK in a defensive manner rather than offensive then our hand playing is basically really weak which breads an entirely weak overall game plan.
Let’s do a few examples to show you what I mean by that:
Regular 2-5 game, 100bb effective, hero is a unknown to the villain but the hero does know that the villain is tourist pleasure player basically playing his own two cards. Non aggressive demeanor at the table and maybe I can call him just a soccer dad, if you will.
Hero opens 3bb to $15 UTG and the villain two seats to our left 3-bets us all-in 40bb to $200. What we do here? ..., Well, what’s his range? - I would say that his rage in the normal run-of-the-mill 2-5 game would be probably QQ+, mostly with just maybe few AK sprinkle in. We’re pounded by this range, we are out of position and this hand reeks of reverse implied odds. Therefore, I fold. This is probably considered sacrilegious by many to fold an AK preflop there is, but I can assure you that if you are not folding an AK some preflop you are leaking quite a bit.
Now, let’s take a look at another one:
2-5 game, 100bb effective. Hero is basically unknown at the table and however has seen a younger seemingly aggressive villain over play 99, TT, JJ. KQ, KJ, AJ, AT preflop by 3-bet them often. The hero opens to $20 in late middle position and the villain quick 3-bets to $75.
What is the hero do? .., Well, what is his rage? - I would say, here on average his range would be 99+, AK for sure and possible AQs, AJs maybe even AQo. Having said that I will 4bet to an amount that the villain is unable to flat and reevaluate after the flop. I’m gonna put him to a push fold decision. This amount I would imagine would be around $200. Placing this amount of pressure on the TT, JJ and QQ will many times produce folds as is plainly obvious to the villain that he has zero fold equity if he shoves. Many times this type of villain elects not to stack-up for TT, JJ and even QQ which is a huge plus for us.
We must always think about what the villain most likely has or he most likely would do with it. This is how we decide on our bet size with which we attempt to get any specific job.
Thank you for the really thorough post, giving good explanations for each point you make
So against an aggressive 3bettor we just 4bet big, and call a 5bet because we are committed? Do we check-fold flop if he just calls the 4bet and we completely miss? I feel like 4betting almost 3x can get us into real trouble sometimes if we are only getting folds from hands we dominate/flip against, and getting it in pretty often against AA and KK.
Then on the other hand 4betting between 2.2x and 2.5x, which is a recommended 4bet size, just get so many calls at the micros. Then playing out of position will not be fun unless you hit the flop.
AK is really a double-edged sword if you ask me
Facing a 3bet when OOP can be a tough spot, even when holding AK. Either you just call and miss the flop 2/3 of the time, or you 4bet, get called, and still miss the flop 2/3 of the time. After 4betting the AK you might try to fire a cbet when you miss, only to get called, and be out of position on the turn, in a miserable spot (unless you improved).
So when you get 3bet and you have AK; how often should you call, and how often should you 4bet? Does it depend on the opponent? It's how to play it at the microstakes I'm interested in.
When we have AK it is important 3bet 4 bet
I totally agree with you. No matter what the AK has got to play by sledgehammer and brute force if we want to play for money. If people wait to flop a pair first with AK before betting we lose 66% of the time plus we lose to other AKings that missed but blow us out of the pot.
We need to raise in such a way as to force opponent to make a decision to either shove or fold and if he shoves we still have a flip of 50/50 against all pairs. We blow away the other two cards combos including all AKings and as I said before we cut in half all the AA/KK combos.
But most of the time when I 4bet AK I do not see them folding or shoving, but CALLING. It's fairly common at the micros. So then we need strategies for postflop play as well: How often and on which types of boards should I cbet in a 4bet pot? Against what types of opponents?
While analyzing a couple of my played hands at 5nl full ring, the following AK hand came up:
Flop : (45.4 BB, 2 players) 4d 7s 6h
BB bets 21.8 BB, fold
BB wins 43.6 BB
After seeing this I was kinda shocked that I made such a bad play. So as you can see I get min 3bet, which is a little different from a normal 3bet. I 4bet, but it's too small to really put any pressure on, and it's a miserable spot when I get min 5bet. What range would you assign to him? I'm just scared of AA and KK everytime someone min clicks it back, but could there be any other hands in his range?
I know 4bet should have been bigger. But could I have flat the 3bet instead? Or folded to the 5bet? Or just gotten it in and pray for A or K?
But could I have flat the 3bet instead?