Erpherk
Rock Star
Silver Level
Looks like blinds 15/30 he could be 4x raising very wide considering how many chips everyone has in which case it wouldn't make sense for him to jam unless he had the nuts. That is a huge river raise for how low the blinds are. I feel like he has some kind of 4 in his hand, but i would have called anyway.. i don't like folding good hands and he could easily have Ax. That's how i see the hand.
malakata19
Visionary
Silver Level
I think the viallano can have a set or a straight, so I would not risk my stack of chips. With the good stack you have, you can afford to lose that pot and move on. It is not reasonable to pay for the way he made a 3bet after such a small bet. Good luck at the tables !!!
I
Ianmacca99
Rock Star
Silver Level
Hard to put him on too many 4s A4 or 44s only. Difficult to see what he is bluffing with here though surely a big ace or a two pair AX would just call the raise not try and turn it into a bluff. What sets could he have here not many really don't think pocket tens would take that line. Difficult to get away from tbh but a lot I'd expect you to lose in this spot
MadDeVille
Rock Star
Silver Level
I would call to. I would love to see the outcome of the hand. Maybe 10's or A10, otherwise he must have bet bigger with A4 on flop and turn. Or he is bulffing.
sedlacekj
Rock Star
Silver Level
I am understanding the blinds were 15/30? It is helpful to post that as well.
Nothing in the villain's bet sizing says he was trying to bluff. In fact nothing out of the ordinary until that bet of 30 on the river. That looks like a trap bet to get you to jam or raise high. I have seen this a number of times where the villain wishes to induce a bluff or all-in from the hero. His all-in at the end seems to indicate since you didn't swallow the bait well enough, he was gonna help you a bit. With a straight developing on the board I can't imagine a player would set up a trap bet followed by a jam with AX. He might have A4, 46, 4X, TT. Of course he could be bluffing, but for all he knows in that case, you have the 4 and he can't bluff you off a straight. My hunch is he is not bluffing the 4.
Fold
Calling the 30 bet on the river is better than raising inducing his all-in. You don't want to risk half your stack with a set against a likely straight, or maybe even a better set.
Nothing in the villain's bet sizing says he was trying to bluff. In fact nothing out of the ordinary until that bet of 30 on the river. That looks like a trap bet to get you to jam or raise high. I have seen this a number of times where the villain wishes to induce a bluff or all-in from the hero. His all-in at the end seems to indicate since you didn't swallow the bait well enough, he was gonna help you a bit. With a straight developing on the board I can't imagine a player would set up a trap bet followed by a jam with AX. He might have A4, 46, 4X, TT. Of course he could be bluffing, but for all he knows in that case, you have the 4 and he can't bluff you off a straight. My hunch is he is not bluffing the 4.
Fold
Calling the 30 bet on the river is better than raising inducing his all-in. You don't want to risk half your stack with a set against a likely straight, or maybe even a better set.
GuiWah
Rock Star
Silver Level
I totally agree. Is better to call the 30 bet ont he river. I have seen similar situations many times where villain tries to induce hero to bluff
