Hey everyone,

My name is Nathan "BlackRain79" Williams. I am a 10+ year poker pro, 3 time poker author and the founder of www.blackrain79.com

It was also around 7 years ago that I decided to sell everything I own, hop on a one way flight to Bangkok, Thailand and travel the world. I am from Vancouver, Canada by the way.

I have been active here on CardsChat for many years and this is the only major poker forum that I consistently recommend, besides my own.

And that is because I have always found CardsChat to be a positive, welcoming environment especially for beginners who want to learn and improve.

Throughout my own poker career I have been mostly a cash game specialist and I am best known for having some of the highest winnings in online poker history at the micro stakes.

I would be happy to answer any poker questions you may have. Or anything else in general!

Although for specific poker hands, please post those in the relevant poker hand analysis sections here on CC. I will be active there also.

Thanks

Nathan

You almost make me want to play cash,,,,,almost lol,,, A big thanks for helping my fellow CC'ers! Blackrain Rules!

Hey Nathan!
I watched almost every videos in your youtube channel and learned a lot, thanks for share your knowledge. my question is: what is your current bankroll?

What are the pros and cons of buying in minimum and maximum at a cash game? Which do you recommend?

Originally Posted by terryk

You almost make me want to play cash,,,,,almost lol,,, A big thanks for helping my fellow CC'ers! Blackrain Rules!

Thanks Terry! There is plenty of money in tournaments as well

Originally Posted by BullXT

Hey Nathan!
I watched almost every videos in your youtube channel and learned a lot, thanks for share your knowledge. my question is: what is your current bankroll?

Hey BullXT,

Thanks for watching my poker YouTube videos!

Oh boy, that's a bit personal no? Haha. My poker bankroll is low 5 figures, this is the money that I set aside for poker only.

Keep in mind that I focus on small stakes games almost exclusively because this is what I teach as well.

If/when I ever decide to tackle mid or high stakes games again, I would use a much bigger bankroll than this.

Originally Posted by mountainfox

What are the pros and cons of buying in minimum and maximum at a cash game? Which do you recommend?

Hey mountainfox,

I have always been a full stacked (buy-in full for the maximum) player so I will be a bit biased here. I think that with a max buy-in you simply allow yourself to win the maximum. And this trumps all.

For me personally, I believe that the mental game is extremely important. So when I sit down to play poker I am very confident in my abilities and I believe I am the best player at the table. So therefore, I want to have the most money possible in front of me, so I can win the most.

Now, I understand the allure of playing on a short stack though. It lowers your risk considerably. Also, if you are playing on a short bankroll, it essentially gives you more "bullets" as well.

I guess lastly, a shorter buy-in also makes your decisions much easier. Much like in the mid to late stages of a tournament, most of your decisions will take place preflop and on the flop. This removes complex turn and river decisions from ever happening.

I would argue that it is precisely these complex turn and river decisions though that is going to help you become a much better player.

I hope this helps.

Thanks for doing this Nathan!

Nathan, how much money do you make on average per month off of cash games in online poker these days? As compared to back in the days that you set your records?

Would you say that your brand and products are more or less successful as a source of income nowadays than your actual online poker grind?

Originally Posted by Debi

Thanks for doing this Nathan!

No prob Debi thanks for having me

Originally Posted by puzzlefish

Nathan, how much money do you make on average per month off of cash games in online poker these days? As compared to back in the days that you set your records?

Would you say that your brand and products are more or less successful as a source of income nowadays than your actual online poker grind?

Hey puzzlefish,

It really depends. I travel a lot these days so some months I am not able to play much poker, whereas other months I am able to play a lot.

My winrates have decreased since the "heyday" of the poker boom like most people but I am still able to consistently post pretty good results in small stakes games. A big key to that is table selection which is something that I have been preaching the importance of for years now.

I also spend a lot of time on my brand and products these days as you mention. And I have also been recommending that poker pros do this for many years. Famous poker pros like Daniel Negreanu and Phil Hellmuth are some of the best ever at marketing themselves and creating significant income sources away from the poker tables.

If you plan to survive in this game over the long haul, this is extremely important and also just plain smart

Hey Nathan thanks for sharing your time.
What would you say are ideal stats for cbeting to win consistently at higher limits?
I know a lot of advice say it's generally 60%, 50%, 50% for flop, turn and river respectively - I think this is good advice for beginning players however I think once you go higher in the limits you might need to increase these numbers - more specifically the turn and river to about 55-60%

What do you think?

This is awesome. Thanks Nathan! I'll be watching this thread with interest!

Nathan!! Welcome to the CC community!! So cool to have you among us!!!

Have no questions right now, but already subscribed to this thread! Thanks you are here "BlackRain79"!

Nice to see you here Nat. Thanks to you, took me 4 months to read everything you posted on your site...you owed me 4 months of my life...lol

Originally Posted by Nathan Williams

Hey everyone,

My name is Nathan "BlackRain79" Williams. I am a 10+ year poker pro, 3 time poker author and the founder of https://www.blackrain79.com/

It was also around 7 years ago that I decided to sell everything I own, hop on a one way flight to Bangkok, Thailand and travel the world. I am from Vancouver, Canada by the way.

I have been active here on CardsChat for many years and this is the only major poker forum that I consistently recommend, besides my own.

And that is because I have always found CardsChat to be a positive, welcoming environment especially for beginners who want to learn and improve.

Throughout my own poker career I have been mostly a cash game specialist and I am best known for having some of the highest winnings in online poker history at the micro stakes.

I would be happy to answer any poker questions you may have. Or anything else in general!

Although for specific poker hands, please post those in the relevant poker hand analysis sections here on CC. I will be active there also.

Thanks

Nathan

Hi Nathan,

Long-time follower and fan-- are you able to beat $2NL on America's Cardroom specifically? I'm having an unbelievably hard time beating this limit in this poker room in particular.

Hi Nathan

Great to have you at CardsChat, I have always been a recreational tournament player but find these days I have less and less time to concentrate on tournaments, I have been thinking of trying cash games, have dabbled a little with zoom games in the past, what should a below average tournament player like myself look out for playing cash?

Originally Posted by cs_rlewis

Hey Nathan thanks for sharing your time.
What would you say are ideal stats for cbeting to win consistently at higher limits?
I know a lot of advice say it's generally 60%, 50%, 50% for flop, turn and river respectively - I think this is good advice for beginning players however I think once you go higher in the limits you might need to increase these numbers - more specifically the turn and river to about 55-60%

What do you think?

Hey cs_rlewis,

This is a really hard question to answer because it is so often going to be player dependent. I think 60/50/50 is pretty good default (in a vacuum) advice.

But my approach to poker how always been about playing the player or what some people call "exploitative strategy" these days.

So versus a TAG I might go 60/50/50 but versus a Nit I might go 70/50/30. And versus a LAG I might go something like 50/40/30 to induce more bluffs.

With rec players it will be almost totally dependent on the strength of my hand because as we all know, it is pretty hard to bluff them. So if I have something good it might be 90/80/80. If I have nothing it might be 60/20/20.

I hope this helps. I really can't give an answer on what the best overall CBet flop/turn/river stats are because for me, it depends so much on the player type, and my hand strength in the case of rec players.

Edit: I just read your question again and I realized that maybe you are talking about bet sizing? My reply above is assuming that your question was about bet frequency. Bet sizing is a whole different story.

Originally Posted by Tammy

This is awesome. Thanks Nathan! I'll be watching this thread with interest!

Thanks Tammy! Great to be here

Originally Posted by CRStals

Nathan!! Welcome to the CC community!! So cool to have you among us!!!

Thank you CRStals, I appreciate the warm welcome!

Originally Posted by onondaga

Have no questions right now, but already subscribed to this thread! Thanks you are here "BlackRain79"!

Happy to help

Originally Posted by YKCaiTLH1314

Nice to see you here Nat. Thanks to you, took me 4 months to read everything you posted on your site...you owed me 4 months of my life...lol

Hey YK,

I apologize for those 4 months haha, I hope you learned a bit about poker though! I have written over 700 poker articles on my website now, so if anybody read them all, they are truly a hero of mine!

Originally Posted by BUSB0Y

Hi Nathan,

Long-time follower and fan-- are you able to beat $2NL on America's Cardroom specifically? I'm having an unbelievably hard time beating this limit in this poker room in particular.

Hey BUSB0Y,

Thanks for the support! I try not to comment on individual poker sites too much because you almost never have a big enough sample to say anything definitive.

It can even depend on what time of the day you play. I live in Asia most of the year so I often deal with different regs when I am over here, as opposed to when I am back home in Canada due to the timezones.

Overall though, NL2 games have tightened up a fair bit over the years on most sites. With that said, most of the regulars are still relative beginners who make a lot of fundamental mistakes.

My advice would be to start studying and learning about player types and how to exploit each one. This is something that I discuss a lot on my blog, in my books and videos.

Because then you can have a general gameplan for large groups of players. For example, you will find a lot of overly weak and tight players at NL2 these days, often called "nits."

They don't like to put a lot of money in the pot without a big hand. So these players are excellent opportunities for bluffing. You want to use scare cards against them on the turn and river in particular, to make them fold a better hand than yours.

This article of mine about double barreling scare cards might help you more:

https://www.blackrain79.com/2017/02/when-to-double-barrel-the-turn.html

I hope this helps.

Originally Posted by Martin

Hi Nathan

Great to have you at CardsChat, I have always been a recreational tournament player but find these days I have less and less time to concentrate on tournaments, I have been thinking of trying cash games, have dabbled a little with zoom games in the past, what should a below average tournament player like myself look out for playing cash?

Hey Martin,

You mentioned time in your question and this is one of the big benefits of cash games in my experience and why I play them. I love the fact that you can just get up and leave at any time. And also sit down to play at any time.

For someone who is looking to make the switch from tournaments to cash games, I would recommend starting at the lower limits.

The average cash game player is more skilled than the average tournament player in my opinion. And this is because in cash games the stacks are often deeper and this forces you to make more complex decisions especially on the turn and the river.

This is not a slight at tournament players. It just is what it is. Deeper stacks = more complex decisions. The biggest difference that you are going to notice in cash games is a lot more play on the turn and river.

So I would really focus on learning what kind of cards to double barrel depending on the player type, who to call down light against and when to bluff the river.

Your tournament history should give you a pretty good basis for preflop and flop play in cash games, but it is likely that you will need to focus on improving your play on later streets.

Hope this helps.

Thank you for doing this! Very awesome of you to do. Could you tell us what your BRM strategies are? Thanks in advance!

what do you think about pokerstars limiting multitabling to 4 tables? do you think that this will change somehow the way people play? A little more loose perhaps?
Thanks

Hi Nathan,

I watch all your youtube videos and have read your first book. I have a rather specific question. I was wondering if you would be kind enough to post some of your longest break even stretches / downswings at the small stakes. It would be really nice for me to see them just so I can say "hey, BlackRain has downswings too, even at the small stakes"

Also, do you still play often, or is poker just not that fun for you any more and live off your poker site revenues?

Many thanks.

It's great to have you aboard, Nathan! I will be watching the thread with interest!

Hi Nate the great,this is really awesome! I've read your answers thus far & they've all been genuine & down to earth.
My question would be how do you stay disciplined with regard to BRM say if you've got a goal & you hit a downswing taking shots (this is a mind state question I guess).. & more specifically for e.g how many bb should I buy in with, how many buyins for a day (if you use a stop-loss)? I've started experimenting with 40bb its perfect if you've got a small bankroll & wanna move up.
Would be nice to hear your experiences throughout the years with regards to downswings, BRM, discipline, travel rake

Hi Nathan,

Always keep up with your channel, you always give a straightforward, truthful take on the micros.

I've started trying to work my way up the stakes and see where that gets me. Luckily I hit a "rhythm" with NL2 early on and posted 11bb/100 over a 10000 sample size. Had a bit of confidence and moved to NL5 where I've posted 7.5bb/100 over another 10k sample.

Now I know those samples could be bigger, which is my question.

If I'm trying to move up how long would you wait to "prove" to yourself that you can beat a given stake?

Thanks in advance and thanks for doing this!

SG

Nice to see you being even more active on our forum. I totally agree that this is the forum that pays off its members in so many ways.

Thank you for taking time to be here and respond to our questions.


I'm a big fan of your videos and satisfied consumer of Crushing the Microstakes (and the study group that this forum created with it a few years back). For 2019/2020, are there things about that book that you would change?

Originally Posted by TPC

Thank you for doing this! Very awesome of you to do. Could you tell us what your BRM strategies are? Thanks in advance!

Hey TPC,

No worries happy to help!

With BRM I tend to use a pretty conservative approach. And this is because I have relied on poker for all or part of my income for a long time. I don't want to ever go broke!

So I typically have like at least 100 buy-ins for any cash game I am playing in. Now, I will say that this is way overkill though for most amateur players. I think that anywhere above 30 buy-ins will be fine.

I am not really an expert on tournament BRM but I would say that 100 buy-ins is probably the minimum recommended for amateurs. This is because the variance (swings, ups and downs) are a lot more pronounced in tourneys than in cash games.

Originally Posted by lkmolina

what do you think about pokerstars limiting multitabling to 4 tables? do you think that this will change somehow the way people play? A little more loose perhaps?
Thanks

Hey lkmolina,

This is something that I have been asked about a lot. A big part of my poker career was spent 24 tabling on Pokerstars, so this was as big of a shock to me as anyone!

Now with that said, one thing I have learned throughout the years in this game is that you have to learn to roll with the punches and the ever changing poker environment. The days of mass multi-tabling on Pokerstars are over and so we have to adjust.

For me, I already stopped doing this many years ago though because I need to table select more in today's games and make higher quality decisions. When I am playing 20+ tables, I can't do these things. I could get away with it in the past but not in today's tougher games.

So I think that the people that want to continue playing a lot of hands will perhaps play more Zoom or play on other poker sites. I think the games might loosen up a bit as well like you suggest.

Originally Posted by TheGenera1

Hi Nathan,

I watch all your youtube videos and have read your first book. I have a rather specific question. I was wondering if you would be kind enough to post some of your longest break even stretches / downswings at the small stakes. It would be really nice for me to see them just so I can say "hey, BlackRain has downswings too, even at the small stakes"

Also, do you still play often, or is poker just not that fun for you any more and live off your poker site revenues?

Many thanks.

Hey TheGenera1

Thanks for being a big supporter of my work!

Oh man, I have had some brutal ones. I have touched on this in a few articles on my website before. I have almost quit poker so many times over the years because I hit the downswing from hell.

I have gone months without posting any kind of profit many times throughout my poker career and in terms of hands, I have gone through 100k+ without winning.

This is why I say all the time that I believe 100k hands is a bare minimum to draw any conclusions about your poker results.

People think I am crazy and I understand that many people do not even play 100k hands in a year. But I know for a fact that you can run significantly below EV (expected value) even over stretches of hands this long.

I still play poker as much as I can. I consider myself semi-pro now. But my poker website and youtube channel alone are a full time job now.

Originally Posted by Shells

It's great to have you aboard, Nathan! I will be watching the thread with interest!

Thanks Shells I am happy to be here!

Originally Posted by azforlife

Hi Nate the great,this is really awesome! I've read your answers thus far & they've all been genuine & down to earth.
My question would be how do you stay disciplined with regard to BRM say if you've got a goal & you hit a downswing taking shots (this is a mind state question I guess).. & more specifically for e.g how many bb should I buy in with, how many buyins for a day (if you use a stop-loss)? I've started experimenting with 40bb its perfect if you've got a small bankroll & wanna move up.
Would be nice to hear your experiences throughout the years with regards to downswings, BRM, discipline, travel rake

Thanks for the kind words azforlife!

I think the thing to always remember with BRM (bankroll management for those reading this that don't know), is that even the best players in the world regularly have to move down.

Because when you are taking a shot, there is always a large element of short term luck involved. Even if you found a really good game against some rec players where you have a large edge, if they cooler you in a couple big hands (KK into AA etc.), that's it for you and you need to move back down.

So with regards to being disciplined with taking shots, I think the best thing to remember is that it is about moving both up and down. Most people just focus on the up part. You should be prepared to fail again and again when taking shots in poker.

With regards to what amount to buy-in for, I already touched on that a bit above in another question, but I have always been a full stack player, 100bb. This doesn't mean that I think buying in short can't work for some people in some situations, it's just not my area of expertise.

Although I did actually even write a big article on that lol. My guide to optimal 50bb poker strategy:

https://www.blackrain79.com/2017/11/50bb-poker-strategy.html

I always recommend for people to learn full stack at some point at least though because if your aim is to be the best player at the table each time you sit down to play, then this is how you are going to exercise your edge to the fullest.

Originally Posted by Shadyginzo

Hi Nathan,

Always keep up with your channel, you always give a straightforward, truthful take on the micros.

I've started trying to work my way up the stakes and see where that gets me. Luckily I hit a "rhythm" with NL2 early on and posted 11bb/100 over a 10000 sample size. Had a bit of confidence and moved to NL5 where I've posted 7.5bb/100 over another 10k sample.

Now I know those samples could be bigger, which is my question.

If I'm trying to move up how long would you wait to "prove" to yourself that you can beat a given stake?

Thanks in advance and thanks for doing this!

SG

Hey SG,

Thanks for following my work! Great results also by the way.

This is a bit of a tough question because variance can be so crazy in poker. I usually say 20k hands to draw a few conclusions, 50k to be fairly certain and 100k to be highly certain.

Now with all that said, for somebody like you who smashes NL2 for 11bb/100 over a still reasonable sample of 10k hands, I don't think there is any reason why you shouldn't move up.

Because depending on your goals in this game, there is a lot of opportunity cost of playing a huge number of hands at a certain limit just to prove to yourself that you can beat it.

I would say that if you are having big success over say a minimum sample of 10k hands like you did, then you should take a shot at the next limit. Worst thing that happens is you fail (which will happen a lot no matter what you do, like I just talked about above in another reply), and you move back down for awhile.

You also always learn a lot from your move up attempts. Many of my failed shots at playing higher stakes have actually been my greatest learning experiences. Especially if I feel like I got outplayed.

Hope this helps.

Originally Posted by nabmom

Nice to see you being even more active on our forum. I totally agree that this is the forum that pays off its members in so many ways.

Thank you for taking time to be here and respond to our questions.


I'm a big fan of your videos and satisfied consumer of Crushing the Microstakes (and the study group that this forum created with it a few years back). For 2019/2020, are there things about that book that you would change?

Thanks nabmom for the kind words and I am glad that Crushing the Microstakes and the videos helped you!

I think limping in early position with small pocket pairs is something that has been talked about a lot in the book. I did edit that section several years ago. I don't recommend limping at all anymore in these games.

The preflop over-raising as well haha. But I am pretty sure I also edited that section several years ago. I don't recommend using these over-raises in most cases anymore at NL2.

Other than that, I think the vast majority of the strategies in the book are still effective in the lower stakes games today. Because I primarily wrote this book to discuss how to play against bad players, recs. And the strategies to beat them I feel are evergreen, they never change.

What I would actually add to the book though if I were to re-write it today, is more strategy discussion of Zoom style fast fold games.

For example, I advocate a lot more bluffing against the regulars in these games because they have less information/reads on you and I think you get more respect.

However, there is a Zoom poker strategy bonus guide that now comes with the book and I have written about this extensively on my website as well in various articles.

Originally Posted by Nathan Williams

Hey TheGenera1

Thanks for being a big supporter of my work!

Oh man, I have had some brutal ones. I have touched on this in a few articles on my website before. I have almost quit poker so many times over the years because I hit the downswing from hell.

I have gone months without posting any kind of profit many times throughout my poker career and in terms of hands, I have gone through 100k+ without winning.

This is why I say all the time that I believe 100k hands is a bare minimum to draw any conclusions about your poker results.

People think I am crazy and I understand that many people do not even play 100k hands in a year. But I know for a fact that you can run significantly below EV (expected value) even over stretches of hands this long.

I still play poker as much as I can. I consider myself semi-pro now. But my poker website and youtube channel alone are a full time job now.

You're welcome, I really enjoy your work and it has definitely helped me over the years.

Thanks for answering my questions It's nice to hear you suffer from the same downswings and have almost quit. I know I've come close many times too.

Originally Posted by Nathan Williams

Hey SG,

Thanks for following my work! Great results also by the way.

This is a bit of a tough question because variance can be so crazy in poker. I usually say 20k hands to draw a few conclusions, 50k to be fairly certain and 100k to be highly certain.

Now with all that said, for somebody like you who smashes NL2 for 11bb/100 over a still reasonable sample of 10k hands, I don't think there is any reason why you shouldn't move up.

Because depending on your goals in this game, there is a lot of opportunity cost of playing a huge number of hands at a certain limit just to prove to yourself that you can beat it.

I would say that if you are having big success over say a minimum sample of 10k hands like you did, then you should take a shot at the next limit. Worst thing that happens is you fail (which will happen a lot no matter what you do, like I just talked about above in another reply), and you move back down for awhile.

You also always learn a lot from your move up attempts. Many of my failed shots at playing higher stakes have actually been my greatest learning experiences. Especially if I feel like I got outplayed.

Hope this helps.

Thanks Nathan! I'll take that on board. Might give the NL5 a bit longer as it's been more volatile, but if I can maintain those results over another 10000 hands I'll take a shot at NL10.

Great speaking to you

SG

Hi Nathan

Is GTO poker the new ABC poker?

ABC poker you play your hand not the opponent.
GTO poker you just play your range correct?

Originally Posted by Dimitris

Hi Nathan

Is GTO poker the new ABC poker?

ABC poker you play your hand not the opponent.
GTO poker you just play your range correct?

Hey Dimitris,

GTO poker is a big trend in the poker community over the past couple years. But I think it is actually doing a lot more harm than good for most low stakes poker players.

I will actually have a big article about this coming out on my website next month that will probably cause a huge stir in the poker community and get me some new haters as well

But essentially you are correct, ABC poker is just playing your cards and GTO is about trying to find mathematically correct frequencies for all your decisions (including how to construct your range).

I advocate a style of play for the lower stakes that is perhaps somewhere in the middle of both of these. It is often called "exploitative strategy" these days. Some people also call it "playing the player."

This is the optimal strategy to beat small stakes poker games for the highest winrate possible in my opinion.

Thank you for the time you spent to answer my question. I am waiting for your article.

Originally Posted by Nathan Williams

I advocate a style of play for the lower stakes that is perhaps somewhere in the middle of both of these. It is often called "exploitative strategy" these days. Some people also call it "playing the player."

Hi Nat,

Many Pros and Coaches, including you, teach about not to open limb. It means weakness and also not maximizing your win on that hand.
I actually limb it purposely on EP knowing that someone will at least min raise me behind. My objective is to 3bet on min raise or shove all in on anything that is raise 5x and above.
Oh and i do this only when i'm having QQ+.
Sometimes i got no raiser which allow the SB & BB get to see the cheap flop, but it's like 80% of the time i get a raise behind.

Am i doing it right to open limb on this occasion?

Originally Posted by Nathan Williams

Thanks for the kind words azforlife!

I think the thing to always remember with BRM (bankroll management for those reading this that don't know), is that even the best players in the world regularly have to move down.

Because when you are taking a shot, there is always a large element of short term luck involved. Even if you found a really good game against some rec players where you have a large edge, if they cooler you in a couple big hands (KK into AA etc.), that's it for you and you need to move back down.

So with regards to being disciplined with taking shots, I think the best thing to remember is that it is about moving both up and down. Most people just focus on the up part. You should be prepared to fail again and again when taking shots in poker.

With regards to what amount to buy-in for, I already touched on that a bit above in another question, but I have always been a full stack player, 100bb. This doesn't mean that I think buying in short can't work for some people in some situations, it's just not my area of expertise.

Although I did actually even write a big article on that lol. My guide to optimal 50bb poker strategy:

https://www.blackrain79.com/2017/11/50bb-poker-strategy.html

I always recommend for people to learn full stack at some point at least though because if your aim is to be the best player at the table each time you sit down to play, then this is how you are going to exercise your edge to the fullest.

Hey Nate,
Yeah the idea of moving down after losing is a big leak of mine. Chronic sufferer of chasing losses but it's definitely something I need to start doing once it happens to make a habit of it. It's so easy to be undisciplined in a field where emotions run high & you're on your own the whole time. It's definitely something I've been thinking about, so thanks for confirming my concerns
With regards to buyins & BB, I'd ideally like to buy in for max as well but I put myself in a situation where I'm never rolled for what I'm about to play. So I agree & will drop this strategy once I'm fully rolled & focus on beating a level squarely like say NL10 & move on NL 20 & so forth.
Appreciate the tips & insight, thanks bro!

Hey Nathan, thanks for doing this. Ya CC really is a great place to learn and share at. And with the additions of the AMA threads it really is helpful. I am a subscriber at your site as well. Looking forward to more articles and answers. Peace.

Originally Posted by YKCaiTLH1314

Hi Nat,

Many Pros and Coaches, including you, teach about not to open limb. It means weakness and also not maximizing your win on that hand.
I actually limb it purposely on EP knowing that someone will at least min raise me behind. My objective is to 3bet on min raise or shove all in on anything that is raise 5x and above.
Oh and i do this only when i'm having QQ+.
Sometimes i got no raiser which allow the SB & BB get to see the cheap flop, but it's like 80% of the time i get a raise behind.

Am i doing it right to open limb on this occasion?

Hey YK,

The old limp/re-raise strategy definitely can still work well in some games. It is important to know who is at your table if you want to try this. Ideally you want to have multiple loose and aggressive players left to act.

Overall though, since you rarely see tables like this at the lower stakes, I think the standard play of raising preflop with your big hands will be more profitable over the long run.

Originally Posted by azforlife

Hey Nate,
Yeah the idea of moving down after losing is a big leak of mine. Chronic sufferer of chasing losses but it's definitely something I need to start doing once it happens to make a habit of it. It's so easy to be undisciplined in a field where emotions run high & you're on your own the whole time. It's definitely something I've been thinking about, so thanks for confirming my concerns
With regards to buyins & BB, I'd ideally like to buy in for max as well but I put myself in a situation where I'm never rolled for what I'm about to play. So I agree & will drop this strategy once I'm fully rolled & focus on beating a level squarely like say NL10 & move on NL 20 & so forth.
Appreciate the tips & insight, thanks bro!

This is a big leak for many people. It's not easy. You just need to remember that it is part of the process though. There will always be both ups and downs.

All the best in your move up attempts and let me know how it goes for you!

Originally Posted by Talden

Hey Nathan, thanks for doing this. Ya CC really is a great place to learn and share at. And with the additions of the AMA threads it really is helpful. I am a subscriber at your site as well. Looking forward to more articles and answers. Peace.

I agree, CC is the best major poker forum out there. Good to see many pros doing AMA's on here now also. Thanks for following my website as well. Many more poker articles/videos coming!