Ok, cracked, coolered, I get the difference.
I am disappointed you would accuse me on not handling beats. I opened this discussion by stating it wasn't a thread about bad beats. I haven't complained in this thread about losing, I am stating my position and asking for comment.
If anything, I am handling beats much better than before I started studying seriously. I am dedicated to improving my play, I am reading, studying and engaging in debate. I have a subscription to Deuces cracked and I am having Nathan Williams provide coaching.
I am pointing out my observation and asking for comment, and the comments have been very enlightening. I bet a lot of players think about this.
If you are congratulating me for surviving AA 7 times, then what hands do you expect me to make good returns on ?
From my observations, the most money won is not on big hands, it's on moderate hands that improve.
Anyone using PT or HM 4 can look up the stats and see if this is correct or not.
By the way, no one EVER won the
wsop with AA or KK, though AA was the losing hand TWICE.
Look, it's a good debate for Poker players to have.
I am enjoying reading the comments, no-one needs to get flamed here, I would rather people be able to say what they feel.
(FWIW I don't advocate loose play, I am hoping for TAG but I keep getting burnt. I am still working at it).