Yes, all is right. If you look at the probability distribution of the total winnings for playing in several tournaments, then the "distribution bell" will be smeared along the x-axis, which will be tantamount to a large spread of results. And if you look at the same thing for playing in thousands of tournaments, then the "distribution bell" for this case will narrow, become very high and thin, and the spread of results relative to the average value of the expected payoff will not be so large.In the short term luck, and in the long term skill.
Or not...🤣🤣 I pushed all in on the flop. (Was the only move ..Pot commited and normally a win..)skills, patience and luck... you got all that and you will be in the money
The chicken and the egg question has a solution, FYI. It's like a Zen koan.I think this is an eternal question, just like the chicken and the egg, and there will always be disputes about it as long as poker lives.
Hi.In my opinion if we talk about one tournament, then here 95% of luck, and if we talk about the distance of at least 1000 tournaments, then 95% takes the skill. What do you think?
I agree with you! In the long term its luck!In my opinion if we talk about one tournament, then here 95% of luck, and if we talk about the distance of at least 1000 tournaments, then 95% takes the skill. What do you think?
I wouldn't say it's 95%. The bigger your starting stack, the more you have the decision to also sometimes fold good hands, as long as you want to avoid "crazy" players. I would argue that more than 40% in a single tournament depends on skill.In my opinion if we talk about one tournament, then here 95% of luck, and if we talk about the distance of at least 1000 tournaments, then 95% takes the skill. What do you think?