I generally prefer to play one table at a time so that I can concentrate on what my opponents are doing but lately I have been playing two at a time (not often, just occasionally and at that, only tournaments) and have been having pretty good results. I don't get to read the other players as well and I have to play more TAG at both tables. This is not my usual style as I am a LAG player most of the time.
What are your thoughts on the advantages and disadvantages of each and what do you prefer to play?
i think playing a one table is best because you can focus on each player.I generally prefer to play one table at a time so that I can concentrate on what my opponents are doing but lately I have been playing two at a time (not often, just occasionally and at that, only tournaments) and have been having pretty good results. I don't get to read the other players as well and I have to play more TAG at both tables. This is not my usual style as I am a LAG player most of the time.
What are your thoughts on the advantages and disadvantages of each and what do you prefer to play?
I like play 4 tables at a time (I already play 6 tables at a time, but I cannot see all tables at once), I prefer that because I have more action and I can pay attention to most actions on all tables and most of the time I have an idea of what the opponent might be doing.