I enjoy 2 tables, if my mind are focus. 4-5 tables are to many for me. But hey, I saw Elky, 30+ tables
https://www.pokernews.com/news/2009...r-sets-new-record-multi-tabling-sngs-6495.htm
crazy!
I generally prefer to play one table at a time so that I can concentrate on what my opponents are doing but lately I have been playing two at a time (not often, just occasionally and at that, only tournaments) and have been having pretty good results. I don't get to read the other players as well and I have to play more TAG at both tables. This is not my usual style as I am a LAG player most of the time.
What are your thoughts on the advantages and disadvantages of each and what do you prefer to play?
the cheap .55 multi is a fun one holdem tables with one table dont add up to much in microI generally prefer to play one table at a time so that I can concentrate on what my opponents are doing but lately I have been playing two at a time (not often, just occasionally and at that, only tournaments) and have been having pretty good results. I don't get to read the other players as well and I have to play more TAG at both tables. This is not my usual style as I am a LAG player most of the time.
What are your thoughts on the advantages and disadvantages of each and what do you prefer to play?