Actually I'd suggest that every single player online who is winning in the longrun with a decent sample size is playing multiple tables. Lowstakes MTT players play upwards of 20 tables.
This comment is based upon what information? Is this based upon your experience? Because I can assure you that this is much different from MANY others. Good MTT players online will play many tables... even High Stakes players are playing 6 tables (if not many more). Winning 'regs' are often playing 20 tournaments simultaneously and a dozen tables is nothing for them.
With experience and practice things can change. What once seemed insurmountable becomes very simple. (I can recall when playing more than 2 tables at a time seemed impossible but today if I were to play less than 6 I would be too bored to play).
fwiw, when I play ZOOM, FastForward, SPEED, SNAP, BLITZ cash tables online, I play 4-tables at a time but at times I've worked that up to playing 6... & even 9. (playing 9 tables of zoom-style poker tends to help make playing 4 tables feel very 'normal' & standard.
Actually I'd suggest that every single player online who is winning in the longrun with a decent sample size is playing multiple tables. Lowstakes MTT players play upwards of 20 tables.
Don't you see, what I'm writing about???... God... It's like I'm talking to a wall.... ONCE AGAIN FOR THE SPECIAL PEOPLE IN THIS THREAD!
1. When you play a 5, 10 or more tables that will provoke you have a lot more mistakes (or incorrect decisions) than if you play 1 or 2 of the table!
2. Mistakes or wrong decisions and profitable or game the in minus are DIFFERENT THINGS!!!
3. I can also play 10 tables without problems and I am not saying, that it's impossible!!! I said, that it is impossible to fully, correctly see, evaluate the full statistics for each player in each tournament. NO HUMAN BRAIN is capable of this!
4. Winning regulars play a lot, because they want to win a lot and lose a minimum of time for this, BUT THEY ALSO LOSE MORE, than if they played 1 or 2 tables at the same time! But they would also win less, than 10 or 20 tables are played! It's logical! But playing 10 or 20 tables brings them a huge number of mistakes and wrong decisions! But these mistakes matter less because the huge number of tournaments in one day is very large!
Actually, I would like to ban more than one online tournament for one player! And so that every city on earth has permits, opportunities and several big poker clubs!
Don't you see, what I'm writing about???... God... It's like I'm talking to a wall.... ONCE AGAIN FOR THE SPECIAL PEOPLE IN THIS THREAD!
1. When you play a 5, 10 or more tables that will provoke you have a lot more mistakes (or incorrect decisions) than if you play 1 or 2 of the table!
2. Mistakes or wrong decisions and profitable or game the in minus are DIFFERENT THINGS!!!
3. I can also play 10 tables without problems and I am not saying, that it's impossible!!! I said, that it is impossible to fully, correctly see, evaluate the full statistics for each player in each tournament. NO HUMAN BRAIN is capable of this!
4. Winning regulars play a lot, because they want to win a lot and lose a minimum of time for this, BUT THEY ALSO LOSE MORE, than if they played 1 or 2 tables at the same time! But they would also win less, than 10 or 20 tables are played! It's logical! But playing 10 or 20 tables brings them a huge number of mistakes and wrong decisions! But these mistakes matter less because the huge number of tournaments in one day is very large!
Actually, I would like to ban more than one online tournament for one player! And so that every city on earth has permits, opportunities and several big poker clubs!
You are actually wrong.
Reason for your beliefs is that you're basing this from your own personal experience.
I can 'optimally' play 4-tables of ZOOM/ FastForward, etc. If playing a lower stake than usual, I am able to optimally play 6tables but can profitably play 8 . The sweet spot being ~6
There was a time when just ONE table of Zoom format poker seemed like A LOT!
There was a time when 2-tabling 6max cash games was too much. But things can change in time with practice & experience. (prior to 888Poker limiting the number of tables one can play, I was regularly 20-tabling there on micro tables with a very large winrate).
I'm certain you'd be amazed if you saw how some players are able to think & at what speeds they're able to do so at.
One question for you... why do you feel the need to type in BOLD & CAPS so often? Seems kinda strange to me.
how can you claim to know this?
You play at around a 10cent average buyin level for tournaments. Honestly the amount of brain power necessary/needed to observe the players/play in games like that would be extremely low
You are absolutely wrong, when you talk about me and you don't know anything about it... It's funny to read your words every time, when you write absolutely not about is, what I'm talking about every time... You again and again do not understand the main truth and the meaning of my words....
I didn't question your game or the game of other players, 10 or more table' at the same time. I can also do it without any problems or restrictions!
Do you think I've never seen, how players play 10 or more tables at the same time?? How fast do they press the buttons?)))) HAHAHAHA LOOOOL this is absolutely very funny))) This is where the conversation can ending)))
If anything is seem strange to you, it's definitely not my problems, sorry... Try to figure in yourself out!
I can assert this, because it is very easy to understand. If you are not able to understand this, I am very sorry for you...
You can't know which games and at what limits I play)) I don't understand where you get this data from... Maybe you can tell me how much money I have earned this year?
Now I also very much doubt your mental abilities, after your words...