I don't particularly mean that driving ability while under the influence should be evaluated on a case by case basis. Your statement is that you will be worse at everything, and instead specific actions should be determined on a case by case basis. I agree that you would be a worse driver and do not condone drivinf under the influence. I do not agree however that you will be worse at "everything", because that simply is not true.
So you basically expected me to make a list of
every activity that a human can do. Ok, I admit, I was lazy and didn't do it, so I said
'everything' hoping you and others will be able to exclude things like sleeping, twerking, standing on the bed and watching a light bulb go out, etc.
Really, that's nitpicking a very decent and well intended post. The true intention was to make people reading it stop trying to gather benefits from doing drugs and then hiding behind them like "Ummm.. well mooooom, a dude on CardsChat told me I will make a lot of money by playing poker while smoking pot. Leave me alooooone."
And brother, it is a fact. If by natural selection we were better off with Ayahuasca streaming through our veins, we would all be shamans now. But hey, we aren't. Sure, there are some cases, recorded ones, where drugs like LSD or meth and even cocaine actually helped an individual to do an activity more efficiently, but that doesn't mean everyone should try it, just to see if they will get better at something.
Now about poker, the pros will probably tell you it's better to play it with a clear head. If you (a general you, not you you) want to be a better player, you might wanna try to be that while sober.
If you're still against me on this, we'll just have to agree to disagree.