It seems to me you are overplaying all the hands you showed above. A/4 o was just a bad call on the flop.
I like your 2/4 hand, although I think you might have missed out on a little extra value by betting so large on the flop. A smaller flop bet (1/4 or 1/3) might have brought along player 7 for one more street.
Playing rag Ace - you just got lucky on that hand. Players 6,7,9 should have squeezed you out from ever seeing a flop.
Pocket Js shove pre in EP, that's just donating chips. Consider playing them with less aggression, maybe min-bet or 2.5 instead. That way you can see a flop and know where you are at when other players play back at you with big bets. And if it rolls around the way it did back to you pre-flop, you could confidently fold and watch the F-fest ensue, being proud you laid down a loosing hand.
You could have come away from that hand only loosing 2.5bb instead of your entire stack.
Pocket Qs and A/K - that's just poker. You got it in good every time and the board didn't corporate.
At one point I played very similar to how you play. And situationally it is good to be aggressive. One thing that helped me become more consistent winning was an interview with a European tourney crusher, I can't remember his name sorry.
But he suggested - just for a while - check back EVERY flop, regardless of your holdings. Regardless if you hit a set, two pair, TPTK, straight, or flush, just check it back.
I was amazed at the results that had, and just as equally important was how it allowed me to be able to range my opponents so much better.
Yes - checking back the flop DOES allow players to make a better hand once in a while, but the knowledge/info I gained from doing that was more valuable than the occasional loss from doing that.
Consider it.
