Check this Spin and Gold Profile

[Funtast]

How the hell is this possible? I don´t get it at all. Anyone?

Even with knowing opponents hands that would be hard to pull off.

 

[SpanRmonka]

It does look very unlikely, but I think its possible over a smallish sample such as this. I currently am struggling to maintain a 40% Top finish.

I'm gonna try and keep my eye on this player and see how they go, not sure you can search a player on GG easily though.

They've not played any other type of poker on the site.....starting to look more and more odd!

 

[Funtast]

It does look very unlikely, but I think its possible over a smallish sample such as this. I currently am struggling to maintain a 40% Top finish.

I'm gonna try and keep my eye on this player and see how they go, not sure you can search a player on GG easily though.

They've not played any other type of poker on the site.....starting to look more and more odd!

I guess with 40% you play maxmum 1$ buyin?
I play .25$ and was able to run at 40% until I started 4-tabling where I don't exploit/outplay opponents that much.
It's sick how nitty you should play on the micros to have good winrates over a big samplesize because players call your shoves far too wide flipping and 60/40 all day long.

 

[SpanRmonka]

Yeah, I mostly just go for free daily spins plus a few extras per week. Totally right, you basically have to play v tight and look to steal from all the very good players who are playing even tighter!! Haha

 

[Huntre]

Mind games, who will be better

 

[Funtast]

Yeah, I mostly just go for free daily spins plus a few extras per week. Totally right, you basically have to play v tight and look to steal from all the very good players who are playing even tighter!! Haha

Indeed.

How do you categorize players fast?
I use something I came up with myself and it's working quite well on the micros.

You check both of your opponents stats and look for the following:
A. High% 2nd place - 35%-40%+ indicates tight to nitty to very nitty playstyle.
B. Low% 2nd place - 0% -31% indicates loose to very loose and up to maniac playstyle.
C. High% 1st place - 35% - 40%+ indicates the player knows basic ranges and what he is doing up to he is exploiting (pushing/calling) very well.
D. Low% 1st place - 0%-32% indicates the player doesn't understand basic ranges up to the player is a passiv callingstation.
Now you can combine AC, AD, BC, BD and have 4 profiles you can work with.

AC: Exploitive player - tight/agressive plays hands in accordance to opponents.
AD: Nitty Fish - when money goes in he usually has it.
BC: Loose player, steals too much, doesn't fear races, sometimes maniac.
BD: Maniacs and maniac stations.

What do you think?

 

[Gallarado777]

I can say it's hard to do it, but if this person did it, it's possible, but we'll watch this player what and how he plays. I hope this player is really strong and he has a lot to learn

 

[SpanRmonka]

Indeed.

How do you categorize players fast?
I use something I came up with myself and it's working quite well on the micros.

You check both of your opponents stats and look for the following:
A. High% 2nd place - 35%-40%+ indicates tight to nitty to very nitty playstyle.
B. Low% 2nd place - 0% -31% indicates loose to very loose and up to maniac playstyle.
C. High% 1st place - 35% - 40%+ indicates the player knows basic ranges and what he is doing up to he is exploiting (pushing/calling) very well.
D. Low% 1st place - 0%-32% indicates the player doesn't understand basic ranges up to the player is a passiv callingstation.
Now you can combine AC, AD, BC, BD and have 4 profiles you can work with.

AC: Exploitive player - tight/agressive plays hands in accordance to opponents.
AD: Nitty Fish - when money goes in he usually has it.
BC: Loose player, steals too much, doesn't fear races, sometimes maniac.
BD: Maniacs and maniac stations.

What do you think?

I like this a lot. I generally play the 6 max, so have a few more players. I scan them and make a quick judgement of tight or not. Then anyone with a low number of games I play as no particular style, anyone who has poor stats, I tend to never bluff, unless I see they are actually tight ish and passive. I might look to utilise your system to some extent.

The other thing I look for are players who are for example a C level, but there actual points are way below this. This can suggest a major downswing, usually caused by the player not taking the games seriously in my experience. Just punting off 0.25 after 0.25

I might try and make something of your catagories