Well what i'm getting at is this.
In this particular situation, our range can be widened or tightened due to table dynamics. If we have a good table dynamic, we can afford to shove a bit tighter in general. If we have a bad one, we should be shoving a bit wider and taking a few more risks as we are not going to get many opportunities in the future.
Good table dynamics for example could include tight players on our left, who we can shove into wide. Smaller stacks on our left as we can shove wide again. tight players on our right who may give us lots of walks.
Bad ones can include things like loose players who we know will call wide on our left. Big stacks that we have to be naturally risk averse against.
Again, i haven't mentioned everything, it's for you to think about yourself.
However, in this particular situation, our table dynamic isn't shaping up to be a good one. We are the shortest stacked player with bigger stacks to our right who can shove wide into us. A good point is that we have a similar short stack to our left which we can shove into wide. Other reads like what the other players are doing can add to this and get it more accurate.
So with that dynamic, i'd say we have to take more risks than usual, as it's unlikely we will be able to find many better spots in the future.
The dynamic changes constantly, it's hard to judge at first. With constant and proper review it's something that can be done before you hit the tables and after a while you can get a better grasp of the dynamics of your table.
