Similar concept from last hand I posted, but here I'm the raiser, the player that shoved had loose aggresive stats with that few hands and flat caller can have some suited broadways and lower pairs. Is it too much to risk tho?

PokerStars - 40/80 Ante 10 NL - Holdem - 9 players
Hand converted by Holdem Manager 3

CO: 1,114 (13.9 bb)
BTN: 2,079 (26 bb)
SB: 2,218 (27.7 bb)
BB: 2,337 (29.2 bb)
UTG: 1,179 (14.7 bb)
Hero (UTG+1): 1,884 (23.6 bb)
MP: 2,740 (34.3 bb)
MP+1: 1,378 (17.2 bb)
MP+2: 4,236 (53 bb)

9 players post ante of 10, SB posts 40, BB posts 80

Pre Flop: (pot: 210) Hero has
fold, Hero raises to 160, 3 folds, CO calls 160, BTN raises to 2,069 and is all-in, 2 folds, Hero calls 1,714 and is all-in, CO calls 944 and is all-in

Flop: (5,062, 3 players)

Turn: (5,062, 3 players)

River: (5,062, 3 players)

Results: 5,062 pot (0 rake)
Final Board:

Hero shows : (Three of a Kind, Sevens)
Main Pot: [3,522]: (Pre 38%, Flop 96%, Turn 100%)
Side Pot: [1,540]: (Pre 69%, Flop 99%, Turn 100%)

BTN shows : (Two Pair, Aces and Fives)
Main Pot: [3,522]: (Pre 27%, Flop 1%, Turn 0%)
Side Pot: [1,540]: (Pre 31%, Flop 1%, Turn 0%)

CO shows : (One Pair, Kings)
Main Pot: [3,522]: (Pre 35%, Flop 3%, Turn 0%)

Hero wins 5,062

Originally Posted by tewwa94

Similar concept from last hand I posted, but here I'm the raiser, the player that shoved had loose aggresive stats with that few hands and flat caller can have some suited broadways and lower pairs. Is it too much to risk tho?

PokerStars - 40/80 Ante 10 NL - Holdem - 9 players
http://www.holdemmanager.com

CO: 1,114 (13.9 bb)
BTN: 2,079 (26 bb)
SB: 2,218 (27.7 bb)
BB: 2,337 (29.2 bb)
UTG: 1,179 (14.7 bb)
Hero (UTG+1): 1,884 (23.6 bb)
MP: 2,740 (34.3 bb)
MP+1: 1,378 (17.2 bb)
MP+2: 4,236 (53 bb)

9 players post ante of 10, SB posts 40, BB posts 80

Pre Flop: (pot: 210) Hero has
fold, Hero raises to 160, 3 folds, CO calls 160, BTN raises to 2,069 and is all-in, 2 folds, Hero calls 1,714 and is all-in, CO calls 944 and is all-in

Flop: (5,062, 3 players)

Turn: (5,062, 3 players)

River: (5,062, 3 players)

Results: 5,062 pot (0 rake)
Final Board:

Hero shows : (Three of a Kind, Sevens)
Main Pot: [3,522]: (Pre 38%, Flop 96%, Turn 100%)
Side Pot: [1,540]: (Pre 69%, Flop 99%, Turn 100%)

BTN shows : (Two Pair, Aces and Fives)
Main Pot: [3,522]: (Pre 27%, Flop 1%, Turn 0%)
Side Pot: [1,540]: (Pre 31%, Flop 1%, Turn 0%)

CO shows : (One Pair, Kings)
Main Pot: [3,522]: (Pre 35%, Flop 3%, Turn 0%)

Hero wins 5,062

Side note - the CO is horrible
And the BTN isn't a whole lot better

Pre-flop
77 is def a standard open here, and with 23BB I like the min-click. I'm also fine with calling off here, and here's why:

Our total UTG range: (77+,ATs+,A5s,KTs+,QTs+,JTs,AQo+) - 116 combo's
Hands we raise (not applicable here I know) - (KK+, AKs, A5s, AQo+) - 44 combo's
Hands we call - (QQ-77, AQs) - 40 combo's
Hands we fold - (AJs-ATs,KTs+,QTs+,JTs) - 32 combo's

Now you can see we are a little unbalanced and we call or raise more often than we fold. But we can make up for this by occasionally flatting AKs and similar kinds of things. Also, in this example, we're going to be folding A5s if we opened it at all - whereas normally we would want to bluff 4bet - in other words we have some wiggle room within the bounds of our total range.

However, the point here is that we have 77 and that hand is in our call range all day long - we need to call in order to protect our range and keep us in balance; especially against a pretty obvious squeeze.

Now, all that range talk is one thing, but now let's look at the math:
- We know our range
- CO (99-22,AJs-A8s,KJs+,QJs,AJo-ATo,KJo+,QJo)
- BTN (JJ+,A5s+,KQs,QJs,JTs,T9s,98s,A5o+)

So, we have 41% equity against both and 57% against the button - plugging that all into the spreadsheet and you can see calling off is the correct play.

It's correct for two reasons, balance (or range protection), and EV - well played!