$1000 NLHE STT Turbo: bubble, what's the correct range given stack sizes and reads?

[cjatud2012]

$1000 NLHE STT Turbo: bubble, what's the correct range given stack sizes and reads?

PokerStars - $1.50+$0.25|200/400 NL (9 max) - Holdem - 4 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

SB: 7,728.00
BB: 1,971.00
UTG: 1,080.00
Hero (BTN): 2,721.00

SB posts ante 25.00, BB posts ante 25.00, UTG posts ante 25.00, Hero posts ante 25.00, SB posts SB 200.00, BB posts BB 400.00

Pre Flop: (700.00) Hero has what range??

...

Don't put it in SNGWiz right away you cheaters (there's more to consider here anyway)

utg is nitty, both blinds are fishy, ~55/35/3.5 and 30/20/1, respectively. How would you adjust for weak tight players? What about TAGs?

 

[cjatud2012]

p.s. in case it's not clear this isn't actually a $1000 STT.

 

[WiZZiM]

I'll leave this alone for others to debate. You don't need SNG Wiz to work out what you should be shoving here.

 

[baudib1]

Probably shoving QQ+.

 

[Rldetheflop]

Probably shoving QQ+.

I might even dump QQ here.

 

[cjatud2012]

similar to the above hand imo: SB is 10/9/11 over ~200 hands, BB is 48/13 over ~50.

PokerStars - $1.50+$0.25|200/400 NL (9 max) - Holdem - 3 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

SB: 1,270.00
BB: 8,836.00
Hero (BTN): 3,394.00

SB posts ante 25.00, BB posts ante 25.00, Hero posts ante 25.00, SB posts SB 200.00, BB posts BB 400.00

Pre Flop: (675.00) Hero has what range?

 

[WiZZiM]

Well for the first one, my default range would be something like AQ+ and 88+. Not sure how you guys can fathom folding stuff like QQ here. Our equity is good, but it isn't that good.

However i guess the shortest stack is about to hit the blinds, so i might tighten that to somehitng like AK and 10's. Still, he doubles up a decent amount of times, and we are suddenly in the blinds. Point is, we really can't afford to fold out too many hands, but we obv don't want to be loose either.


Second hand is completely differant. We're now ITM, so calling ranges widen, we have a lot more equity than above, and taking down the blinds doesn't change that a lot. The SB can call us wide considering he is ITM and is not risk averse. Same can be said for the BB.

If the SB is a regular, we can probably expect him to shove in a wide range, and the BB will probably call fairly wide.

All in all, we're still shoving a reasonably tight range, probably something like AT+ and 88+ Perhaps KQs. Perhaps a little tighter if i knew how these games played in general. I suspect they wouldn't be calling super wide, but I may be wrong.

 

[Rldetheflop]

Well for the first one, my default range would be something like AQ+ and 88+. Not sure how you guys can fathom folding stuff like QQ here. Our equity is good, but it isn't that good.

However i guess the shortest stack is about to hit the blinds, so i might tighten that to somehitng like AK and 10's. Still, he doubles up a decent amount of times, and we are suddenly in the blinds. Point is, we really can't afford to fold out too many hands, but we obv don't want to be loose either.


Second hand is completely differant. We're now ITM, so calling ranges widen, we have a lot more equity than above, and taking down the blinds doesn't change that a lot. The SB can call us wide considering he is ITM and is not risk averse. Same can be said for the BB.

If the SB is a regular, we can probably expect him to shove in a wide range, and the BB will probably call fairly wide.

All in all, we're still shoving a reasonably tight range, probably something like AT+ and 88+ Perhaps KQs. Perhaps a little tighter if i knew how these games played in general. I suspect they wouldn't be calling super wide, but I may be wrong.

well I have been thinking about it since I posted and I think folding QQ would be pretty bad but for me personally I dont think I could shove as wide as AQo here but thats just me.