the problem with carbon is their vip program isn't good after the recent overhaul and there is no rakeback. it's too bad wpn's sng action isn't that good. with rakeback, you think a lot more sng players would be that network.
Carbon is probably best for SNG but I think you get a lot more value for your buy-in on the WPN for MTT's. WPN's SNG traffic is pretty much non-existant though. No real playing experience on Bovada but its got better traffic so I would assume that it is just as good if not better for SNG, MTT, and cash games.
bovada has $1 45 mans go off a lot the problem is tiling those tables bc they are a weird size, merge has some but i have found intertops to have a little more volume. I have always wanted merge to get more volume bc their software is by far the best and their new mtt schedule is awesome but any sng mtts don't go off but they have added small buy small guarentees that play like them but they are a little slow with 3K starting stacks great for adding in volume but not the best time effective
Thanks for all the responses. I I already played on Carbon Poker some and I was considering depositing on Bovada. Carbon had a lot small stakes sit and goes running when I played but I never played anything over $1.