Trying to figure out if I'd be better off at GG, my brain just melted. Probably not even worth bothering with, but I like to understand things.
On GG I could complete plankton and goldfish levels to become a bronze shrimp (lol wtf is this?), which would require a fair bit of volume for a couple of weeks, switch to the platinum program, become a platinum fish and take 20% thereafter.
pokerstars I'm going to be at 15% on this new structure, 17.5% at best.
Sounds like it would be worth switching to GG so far, but the rake on Stars is a little lower to begin with so that's a plus for Stars, and 100 points per $1 rake isn't guaranteed on GG. I don't know how much it varies, it's not very clear.
Is the rate I receive Fish Points fixed?
Players will receive up to 100 Fish Points (FPs) for every $1 paid in rake/fees. This value is based on various factors, including but not limited to game type, the tournament played, player behaviour at tables and deposit history.
They say games are softer on GG, but it's $2NL I play currently, can't see there being a difference. Bottom level is bottom level.
Maybe if I moved up a bit.