If Spin n Go changed

[Spaceman]

And instead of having as standard prize the doubling of your buyin, would triple it (minus the rake) as it should be in the first place, wouldnt it be super profitable? And ok, I understand pokerstars is just too greedy, what about all the other rooms? Why no room offer that?

 

[Acechador]

And instead of having as standard prize the doubling of your buyin, would triple it (minus the rake) as it should be in the first place, wouldnt it be super profitable? And ok, I understand Pokerstars is just too greedy, what about all the other rooms? Why no room offer that?

Well it is a game mode with a lot of adrenaline and that makes people forget that it would triple their money instead of duplicating it.

The profits should be good for PS, so it does not change it, nor will it.

 

[Zvezda kz]

Recently it has become impossible to play this kind of poker by 0.25 cents. I played for training at the final tables. But what happened there lately is an inexplicable phenomenon for me. Players get incredible combinations on the river.

 

[Paya_31]

Hello, tripling the prize directly I do not think they do, but sometimes at roulette get up to 10 times, has not yet left me this award, but if 6 times the input.

 

[vov4ik]

all the rooms do so as it is beneficial for them, they could not do so that the players were good and profitable and for them would be a minus and not profitable, somewhere and on something the players raise but then in other ways they lose or very little a win, but you need to get used to such games on poker rooms or play live poker in a casino

 

[Spaceman]

all the rooms do so as it is beneficial for them, they could not do so that the players were good and profitable and for them would be a minus and not profitable, somewhere and on something the players raise but then in other ways they lose or very little a win, but you need to get used to such games on poker rooms or play live poker in a casino

The thing is I dont understand why would it be a minus for poker rooms to have that game. Maybe it would be less profitable but why minus? We talk about poker rooms that offer freerolls, bonus when you deposit, rakeback or rakeback system, guaranteed prizes and try whatever they can to attract new players from signing famous poker players to always adding some new variation on games. 888 have rakeless tournies for example. Having a game that its beatable by any kind of player and super profitable would be the best advertise for any room.

 

[Mortis]

And instead of having as standard prize the doubling of your buyin, would triple it (minus the rake) as it should be in the first place, wouldnt it be super profitable? And ok, I understand Pokerstars is just too greedy, what about all the other rooms? Why no room offer that?

If they tripled it instead of doubled, the site would lose money. The extra buy-in is used when they put it in the mega pots of the Spin & Gos.

 

[Spaceman]

If they tripled it instead of doubled, the site would lose money. The extra buy-in is used when they put it in the mega pots of the Spin & Gos.

No, in my version of spin n go there will be no jackpot prizes. The standard prize of tripling your buyin would also be the maximum. If they really want it, they could just add a Jackpot prize like $1000 when the rake will add up. I would still choose to win $1000 more often than never win the million or whatever prize they offer.

 

[Aremaz95]

I would not change anything to the spin and go as they are a good game

 

[Spaceman]

I would not change anything to the spin and go as they are a good game

There is no reason to change the spin n go for the players who like it, they could leave it as it is. Just add a new version, like it happens already with spin n go max that doesnt interferes with regular spin n go.

 

[demibar]

Sounds nice ,I would definitely proffered that option but there is also spin a go max on P.S .

 

[Spaceman]

Sounds nice ,I would definitely proffered that option but there is also spin a go max on P.S .

Spin n Go Max is even worse than regular spin n go in terms of return of your investment. You could play against a full ring only to double your buyin if you are "unlucky" on the wheel. At least as long as I remember, cause I have to play spin n go max for years.

 

[Spaceman]

So? Nobody have an explanation why poker rooms dont offer a more beatable version of spin n go?

 

[demibar]

So? Nobody have an explanation why poker rooms dont offer a more beatable version of spin n go?

Lately P.S has changed the spin and go (regular)on....graphics lol.It's something cost more I guess ,than promising a spin randomly of huge amount that will never come

 

[ganbat]

Isn't it just same thing?

 

[Spaceman]

Isn't it just same thing?

How can winning two times your buyin that I propose is the same with winning just one time your buyin that happens right now?

 

[PHX]

The draw to the spin n go game is the bigger prizes possibility
They cannot use the rake to add to prize pool it must be separated. The could theoretically charge less rake or give a slightly smaller prize and run a random Jackpot.

Pokerstars do have 2max and 6max sit n go in same hyper format with standard payouts. They have them in Omaha as well and they have been around years before spin n go was introduced. I just doubled check with my stats to be sure Spin n go was launched late 2014 I have over 2000 6 max hyper sit n go Omaha 8 games in 2013. Spin n go have taken a lot of the traffic from those game though.

I am guessing that a regular 3 max hyper game will not draw as much traffic. They would have the statistics to back up their decision of not offering format. You can always suggest the format to them. Maybe if enough persons suggest it them they will try it.