i agree because it is an option and its players choice is he going to play or not.i disagree. i think rebuy and multi entry tournaments should exist just like freezout tournaments with only one entry aswell. its your choice whether you like to play a tournament with re entries or not.
I don't mind different types of tournaments as much as I HATE being one of 38 people registered on time for a Guaranteed prize MTT only to have it finish with +1250 and 3 hours of late registration. 1R/A are actually the closest to the new freezeout. I think if you late register you should have a blinded stack.
What are your thoughts on this?
Why?
You are basically getting mad at people for sacrificing ROI to you (assuming you are a winning player, which is a big assumption given this response) and juicing the prize pool.
Why do you hate that?
What are your thoughts on this?
Because it is constantly ruining the table dynamic at critical points of the tournament. If I'm seated at a table with 35-45 bb and two late entries fall on my table with no other option than to shove I'm forced into decisions that could commit my whole stack when without those late entry gonzo's I have positioned myself to have a shot to win the whole thing. Without being forced to play my whole stack. And yes that's a very big assumption your making! Brick and mortar I'm up to a three year span of "none if your business" and online if you believe shark scope is accurate then go ahead and check me out. It says I'm a big fish
Without re-entries on sites like carbon the prize pool's would be cut drastically.
For sure. I think the point in this thread is that the more rebuys, the less skill to win. Some people would rather play poker for less money than bingo for more.
You can play these for less money and NOT bingo.
Can you get the rest of the field to do this as well?