White House Finally Answers on Poker Petition

B

bbrriiaann6

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Total posts
4
Chips
0
They means of technologically circumventing restrictions that can allow individuals from countries where gambling is illegal to play. Online games publishers are like a cheater because gambling sites are much easier and like telemarketing scams.
 
Dreams of Tragedy

Dreams of Tragedy

dreamsoftragedy.com
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Total posts
1,573
Chips
0
you do know that the white house does not care, since they like to spend money that they dont have
 
lcid86

lcid86

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Feb 28, 2009
Total posts
3,196
Awards
9
US
Chips
452
Try writing your congressman. I received a very similar, wordy response, that took absolutely no position and thanked me for contacting him. Until they figure out how to tax something for their benefit, they don't care.
 
A

always2away

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 7, 2007
Total posts
254
Awards
1
Chips
0
I have been saying for years on this issue...be careful what you wish for. The folks who are taking a stance that government usually turns out to be a bigger problem for the average joe than a business out in the world, usually have a little more experience with such things in their personal history.

Government is greed and power and unstoppable force with unlimited resources (relative to the average joe or the average billionaire, for that matter).

Government in America was supposed to focus on protecting Americans lives and property, and it did just that for about a hundred years.

Today, Government is just as likely to destroy your life over what should be none of their damn business as they are to protect you.

Todays politicians are usually more focused on what they can extract from you in regulation and taxes than they are on protecting you from shady businessfolks. And when they do go after the shady ones they usually end up seizing citizens assets and levying fines against the offending shady business and everybody gets screwed (except the bureaucrats, of course).
 
C

credsfan03

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 10, 2011
Total posts
649
Chips
0
I agree that a 30% tax will ruin the game of online poker. Nevada has legalized online poker so we will be able to see what the taxes are like soon.
 
S

Sheyetterly

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Oct 12, 2012
Total posts
3
Chips
0
So much for the American Dream, what about the Poker Dream ??? I think it is time they wake up and allow the US to live like a democracy!
 
deucem

deucem

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Total posts
147
Chips
0
I agree that a 30% tax will ruin the game of online poker. Nevada has legalized online poker so we will be able to see what the taxes are like soon.
I would think that the tax would be levied as some type of licence say $25,000/poker site/year rather than a % of winnings.

Maybe I am wrong and the states will go for a % of profits.
 
B

Big_Rudy

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 17, 2010
Total posts
1,833
Chips
0
I would think that the tax would be levied as some type of licence say $25,000/poker site/year rather than a % of winnings.

Maybe I am wrong and the states will go for a % of profits.

^^ Not sure what you're referring to here. The sites will certainly be taxed on their profits, but most of the discussion is about how/how much PLAYERS will be taxed on their winnings. We've been over this ground in other threads before and, although no one knows anything definite yet, I would anticipate a personal tax in the area of 25-30%. That will just make it even tougher to turn any kind of post-tax profit for many players.
 
D

dan abnormal

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Aug 26, 2010
Total posts
1,045
Chips
0
If they dont do it federaly, it wont happen without headaches. Lets say Nevade starts online site tomorrow for Navadians. The same thing that is happening to the pot dispensaries in CA for medical Pot. Its ok in the state but the feds come into the state raid them and close them down or take the the money. You think the feds wont do that over and over to state run online poker. HMMM Navada party poker is out of line lets raid them, take the money and then tell players, Its not legal federally
 
Charade You Are

Charade You Are

you can call me Frost
Silver Level
Joined
May 9, 2008
Total posts
2,446
Chips
0
Not the same thing. Unlike drugs, no federal law makes playing online poker illegal, the Wire Act is out of play and the UIGEA defers to state law.
 
Roller

Roller

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Mar 14, 2009
Total posts
2,157
Awards
4
US
Chips
190
Typical GovernMental pointless dribble.
 
WEC

WEC

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 28, 2007
Total posts
5,730
Chips
0
We've been over this ground in other threads before and, although no one knows anything definite yet, I would anticipate a personal tax in the area of 25-30%. That will just make it even tougher to turn any kind of post-tax profit for many players.

There are no plans for an additional tax on players. Online Poker Players are already responsible for paying taxes. And 'Gambling Taxes' are already much more onerous then 'Regular Income Taxes' in the US

Now, they may introduce Withholding and/or W2Gs (or similar) for a threshold, but I have not read what they are doing there in the current Federal Draft Legislation.
 
B

Big_Rudy

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 17, 2010
Total posts
1,833
Chips
0
Yeah, it's all just speculation at this point, but I really doubt online poker will be allowed back in the US in any meaningful form without the government guaranteeing that they get their share. You are right, of course, in that online players are already responsible for paying taxes, and although I'm sure we all abide by that;) , I really think that other steps will be implemented to ensure that the required taxes are paid.

So, perhaps it's better not to say "new taxes", but instead "new enforcement polices of existing tax laws", or something in that vein. Either way, not good for the recreational player who made any kind of profit, no matter how small, and will likely now be forced into giving Uncle Sam a cut.

FWIW, I expect, note I said expect, the site to be responsible for the withholding and just automatically deduct it from any cashout that you request. I actually would not be surprised if there were no floor at all to this amount and that any cashout, no matter how small, will face automatic deduction of the required withholding amount. But, only time wil tell, I guess. Never-the-less, color me pessimistic:( .
 
Top