H
Hughsthis
Rising Star
Bronze Level
In a small pub Holdem tournament run by a guy who is normally great at making decisions after unusual events, the following occurred:
With big Blinds on 2,000. I was dealing and had AK. Everyone folded round to me and I limped with 2,000. Small Blind shoved 4,000. Big blind folded and I snap called (from my 7,000 stack) declaring AK. When I went to turn my cards over, I saw there were 4 cards in front of me. What I hadn't noticed was that the BB's mucked cards had accidentally been thrown across the rather narrow table and ended up on top of mine. "All in" turned over JQ. Then a discussion started about "touching mucked cards" so my hand should be voided (even though behind the betting line). I knew I had AK and BB confirmed his cards (not a problem with only 4 cards to sort out), so I felt it was completely unjustified to have to give up the hand through no fault of my own, and to more than double up a person who was very likely to have been knocked out.
The tournament director said that unfortunately "those were the rules". I said under the circumstances this was a very unfair decision. Later he did concede that I should only have lost 2,000 as my cards were "dead" when I called the "All In".
In my view there were three options:
(1) The "rules are rules" situation decribed above.
(2) In the spirit of "fair play", and with no chance of the 4 cards being mixed up, the TD could have agreed to play out the heads up showdown.
(3) We could have voided the hand and taken chips back.
Any thoughts / comments would be appreciated.
With big Blinds on 2,000. I was dealing and had AK. Everyone folded round to me and I limped with 2,000. Small Blind shoved 4,000. Big blind folded and I snap called (from my 7,000 stack) declaring AK. When I went to turn my cards over, I saw there were 4 cards in front of me. What I hadn't noticed was that the BB's mucked cards had accidentally been thrown across the rather narrow table and ended up on top of mine. "All in" turned over JQ. Then a discussion started about "touching mucked cards" so my hand should be voided (even though behind the betting line). I knew I had AK and BB confirmed his cards (not a problem with only 4 cards to sort out), so I felt it was completely unjustified to have to give up the hand through no fault of my own, and to more than double up a person who was very likely to have been knocked out.
The tournament director said that unfortunately "those were the rules". I said under the circumstances this was a very unfair decision. Later he did concede that I should only have lost 2,000 as my cards were "dead" when I called the "All In".
In my view there were three options:
(1) The "rules are rules" situation decribed above.
(2) In the spirit of "fair play", and with no chance of the 4 cards being mixed up, the TD could have agreed to play out the heads up showdown.
(3) We could have voided the hand and taken chips back.
Any thoughts / comments would be appreciated.