You risk a lot! Only you would with AA or monster flop but it never would do so is to risk a move just to try and steal some chips? Not justify it!
AA isnt a squeeze play. AA is 3betting for value.
Stealing blinds with garbage hands can not work because end up being a fish! Prefer to steal the blinds with a strong hand like AA said before over not getting paid! They are ways of interpreting! Also you determines the stack!
Stealing blinds with garbage hands can not work because end up being a fish! Prefer to steal the blinds with a strong hand like AA said before over not getting paid! They are ways of interpreting! Also you determines the stack!
as stated in a few of the previous comments, a squeeze isn't essentially going over top of a raise and call or at least I wouldn't recommend. A squeeze in my thoughts is when you are say lp (btn or co) and you get probably 3 or 4 limpers before action gets to you, you put in a big raise to squeeze all the limpers out of the pot and pick up all them dead big blinds . Trying to pull of such a play of course comes depending on the action at the table, and with so many if going to squeeze I would still want a decent hand to do it with like kq or ak or aq because the more players you are trying to squeeze the higher chance you might get one who will call and at least then you can hope with still a decent hand and position you can outplay them post-flop.I squeeze sometimes with decent hands like low pairs and Ax, but I do not recommend doing it with rags. Chances are that the raiser has a strong hand and you'll be behind, the caller will fold most of the time because he would've 3bet if he had a strong hand.
Actually the definition of the term 'squeeze' as it relates to poker is to reraise following a raise and a call. It's not a RFI to punish limpers as you describe. It can be a 3bet for value, but is usually associated with a stealing maneuver and thus is quite often done with air or semi-bluffy hands.as stated in a few of the previous comments, a squeeze isn't essentially going over top of a raise and call or at least I wouldn't recommend. A squeeze in my thoughts is when you are say lp (btn or co) and you get probably 3 or 4 limpers before action gets to you, you put in a big raise to squeeze all the limpers out of the pot and pick up all them dead big blinds
Actually the definition of the term 'squeeze' as it relates to poker is to reraise following a raise and a call. It's not a RFI to punish limpers as you describe. It can be a 3bet for value, but is usually associated with a stealing maneuver and thus is quite often done with air or semi-bluffy hands.
This is not always the case, especially in micro tournaments. Some players will limp in late position with top pocket pairs even after a couple of limpers call an early pos. raise, this seems like a stupid play because their hand goes down in value if the players after don't reraise. But in the event someone does reraise, this player will have the option of shoving (late in tourney it's a real good play because you are likely to get called by a 10 to 20 BB stack) or calling the raise if no one else calls ( profitable if you can outplay a deep stack post flop).I squeeze sometimes with decent hands like low pairs and Ax, but I do not recommend doing it with rags. Chances are that the raiser has a strong hand and you'll be behind, the caller will fold most of the time because he would've 3bet if he had a strong hand.
You don't understand the concept of "stealing." Stealing is use your stack/position/aggression to force a fold of the blinds (and maybe chronic limpers) with any two cards. It's a fold equity play. So yes, "garbage hands" is what you would be doing that the most with. Stealing is an inherent bluffing scenario.
When you actually have a hand, you don't want to steal (i.e. have people fold). You want the opposite, which is to bet for value and hope to get called by worse.
Squeezing is a similar concept. As was said, if you have a big hand like AA, it's not a squeeze play, it's a value 3bet. A true squeeze play means again that you're using your stack/position/aggression to fold out weak hands that can't/won't call. A common situation is when a donk/maniac PFRs and a TAG button flats to try and outplay them post flop. The blinds can come over the top with a squeeze in hopes of one of two outcomes: isolate the donk, or fold him out, either having the expectation that the tighter button player will be forced to fold all but the top of his range.
Don't know where you play or at what stakes, but where I've played live up to 500NL the ranges are much wider than online at 25NL and up.Though i think its more effective in live play while in online poker i think people call with wide range.