This isn't online where buy-ins can range from 20 blinds to 100 blinds or 40 blinds to 200 blinds. In the tables, buy-in ranges are from 20 blinds to 50 blinds. I mostly buy-in for 30 blinds because I manage really well with it. 30 blinds is good enough to play solid poker. Online, 30 blinds aren't enough because you have people who buy-in for 100 blinds or more. But in tables where they have maximum of 50 blinds buy-in, 30 blinds is enough. Not short-stacked but not deep-stack either. If you honestly think 30 blinds is short-stacked, then good luck with tournaments during late stages of tournaments. I buy-in between of 30-50 blinds in live cash games while I buy-in 50 blinds minimum online on full tilt and 100 blinds on ultimate bet. I avoid buying in maximum because my play become very loose. I rather start off medium-stacked.
I just got back from playing live, I played the 5/10 table the night it ran. Unfortunately the poker room isn't as big as some other ones so 5/10 was the highest that ran and there was only one table even Saturday night. Every single player at the table had at least 1k.
Also you misunderstood me. You can play solid poker with any stack over min, I just don't believe you are. If you're whining about losing 100 blinds I highly doubt you are shipping in 25-30 over a LP raise with hands like SCs or depending on the table hands like AJ/KQ, which is the kind of play you should be making if you have that kind of stack size.
The problem is this style of play leads to high variance, which means you're even more likely to lose 1k because you'll be flipping so often while if you're just nitting it up like I suspect you are you're not playing your stack optimally.
Also, this statement is completely false:
"Online, 30 blinds aren't enough because you have people who buy-in for 100 blinds or more."
If everyone at the table buys in for 30 big blinds or 30 million big blinds, it's the exact same in your eyes if you buy in for 30 big blinds. Since no one else can make you call for more than your 30 it's the same thing. So why would it suddenly not be enough when people have more?