I don't read poker books any more but when I did the first 4 chapters of Applications of No-Limit Hold'em by Mathew Janda was pretty good. Super System and Barry Greinstein's book are the most entertaining though, that I've read. Past a certain skill level I think all poker books become useless. In the end you need to run the calculations and study the strategy, looking for patterns. There is no substitute anymore in my opinion.
If you are interested in nash-equilibrium strategies though, I would recommend to stay away from Modern Poker Theory. I've tried to read the first one but it's so basic trying to look valuable by being disguised with lots of math and copy and past filler material. Waste of time and money, and again, isn't a substitute for doing the work yourself.
I myself do not agree with that, because I learn new elements of poker in almost any book I read or video I watch. Now whether or not that really applies to my game overall (to make money) is definitely subjective, but for me, learning more and having more knowledge of the game is beneficial and of course enjoyable!
If just toying with strategies was all it took, you would be a multi-millionaire like the rest of the high pros lol.
No, there is value in learning all you can if you want to take the game serious. It doesn't just come with reading a few books and winging it from there on out with practice. It takes diligent study and practice at the same time.
I do know that some have a natural ability to just pick up on the game instantly, but most get disappointed after they run hot for a period of time, then when they have a major downswing...Most do not resurface, this is why you do not see the same hotshots from the early days still striving to this day.
No few books will ever skyrocket anyone to a level of excellence, and for sure not tweaking on the fly will either, even if you run hot for a short time.
It is a huge craft that takes many years to get "close" to mastering, as you can never truly "master" poker as there is the element of luck that exists with every hand, of every game.
Sorry I just winged this reply, I can revise it if I want to spend more time on it, but nup
