Stop being results oriented.Down significantly more. Went down to .05/.1 to see how I fared, a little below break even over a few hours time.
Will take tomorrow off to re-read SSHE. Then will decide next course of action. I think I need to go back and try playing a lot looser PF but nittier post flop. Playing too tight pre AND post flop gets me nowhere, playing too loose post flop gets me nowhere. Playing looser preflop seems like an option....
Stop being results oriented.
Okay a few things I'm pulling out of my hand histories:
- Inconsistency preflop. I'm folding hands to raises that probably can cold-call (AQo and KJs come to mind here, just SLIGHTLY looser than "Tight" recommendations in SSHE), but playing hands that SHOULD NOT cold call (QJs for example). Furthermore I'm calling with low PPs (22-66) up front, but folding KQ from UTG. Also not pushing my equity edge with hands like AJ and AT by not raising from the button (Much smaller mistake). I need to clean this up bad.
- On at least one hand I check/called with the nut straight. Who does that?
Plus basically just.... TONS of hands like 42o J6 K5 A3o.... Oh well. Analyzing is really refreshing. Every time I do it I feel like I pull A LOT out of it. I just posted a hand in the ring hands that I couldn't figure out.
(Moved thread to LP)
Random thought that popped into my head - feel free to heed or ignore as you wish.
Review a session or two and try separating your hands into three different categories.
1) "I'm certain I played this correctly"
2) "I think I played this correctly"
3) "I had no idea what to do at all here"
Post some hands in category 2 and explain your thought processes. If you get dozens of dissenting voices, take it on board. If you post a few category 2 hands and are consistently opposed by others analyzing the hand, it's likely there are fundamental flaws in your game. So next, take a step back and post some category 1 hands. If you are certain you made the right play in a hand and people are still disagreeing with you en masse, it's probably time to go study for a while.
As you get more and more 'agreement' with your category 2 hands, then move on and start posting category 3 hands. Don't be afraid of saying "I had no clue what to do here" - every single poker player has no clue what to do on occasion. Just provide all the information you can and let others (and yourself in absorbing and questioning the information given to you by others) take care of the rest.
I read through some of these threads and quickly realize that a lot of times I don't have the knowledge to delve so deeply into a specific hand like you guys do, but I know the best way to learn is to analyze my own playing. I'm still playing micro limit (as per FPau's Advice For New Player's).
So here's 2 questions--
1. As a beginner, I feel unsure about a decision at least once every 2 or 3 hands, and almost every time I see the flop, so how can I start picking and choosing ones to get really in depth with?
and 2. Do you guys ever open the hand history for a night and read through each hand and review the decisions over the course of the session (as opposed to debating a small number of hands)? Would you recommend that to a beginner?
Thanks!