TAG here usually, but LAG depending on the table. I'm not a super great player (I've only recently transitioned into a "winning" player through a bunch of study and determination to "git gud" so I can't tell you the best way) but I've learned that aggression is rewarded more often than passive play. If a table is splashy with calling stations, I tighten my ranges up and go HARD when I get something good/worth playing. On a tighter table with regs or nits I play a bit looser and bluff more often. But passive? Some other guy said "aggressive in tournaments and passive in cash games" I wholeheartedly disagree with being passive in a cash game, especially in a 6max, aggressive action is always the most profitable for me. In tournaments I limp in a lot early on, and play aggressively if I hit or if I think I can bluff the hand. Closer to ITM I bluff a lot more, and play a lot more aggressively since no one wants to bust out. Then ITM I tend to mix it up. If I'm deepstacked I more selective with the hands I play, but if I'm 20bbs or less I'll shove a lot, or minraise to steal blinds. Just depends on the situation.