Are aggressive players the most dangerous?

[satoruf]

It has always been said that aggressive players are the most dangerous.
This is true and it is also false, because aggressive players could say that they almost force you to bet a large part of your stack on the hand that you are going to give a call, but it is also false, because, imagine that you give a call, the aggressive player has “A10", you have JQ and that's where the players come on the scene to seem cool, calm or intelligent, giving a simple call with QQ or AA, the flop comes out QJA and both the player and chill know and wait for the aggressive chill to rise, so the player comes out, Hide behind the token ambition of the aggressive with A simple call until he found the opportunity to take away the maximum value of the hand, concluded that both players are dangerous, but in my opinion there is only one type of lethal player.

 

[pentazepam]

Only if they have a gun.

 

[yogo9]

Yes aggressive players are dangerous, Only way to win an aggressive opponent is to be aggressive back, So usually ill wait for a very strong hand and play.

 

[Station_Master]

Only if they play well.
Agrofish are easy to play against and an easy source of profit (but with high variance)

 

[A kiravio]

Aggressive players constantly or almost every hand they play, are a danger to the development of the game, produce a certain discomfort, this is also a desired effect sometimes. Be patient and pay attention to his position at the table. He could earn well after his aggressive behavior.
The idea of going back aggressively is not very brilliant because you will be paid withholding, or not at all.

 

[ancakeul]

yes bicause you dont no what they have in hand is not easy to play whit a agresive player when you ar deep in tournaments and you dont have a good bankroll

 

[Dimidrol2]

Aggression is good when there is something to aggregate, and when it happens in every hand, it's luck for me. You wait for the card and take the bank).

 

[German629]

Are aggressive players the most dangerous?!. Hm, I don't think so... By my opinion, the aggressive players aren't more dangerous,
than the other kinds of players. I think, aggressiveness this is line of their character... Nothing less, but and nothing more!

 

[BelFish]

Tight-aggressive and loose-aggressive are different types of players... It’s difficult to play against the first type, but you just need patience against the second...

 

[edenman1]

I find it can be hard to play against really aggressive players, but its sweet when you catch them and win their chips!

 

[MikeCarasone]

Depending on how you approach them. You can benefit from players that are over aggressively playing too many hands and trap them into a big stack. I tend to enjoy battling aggressive opponents l patiently awaiting the inevitable opportunity to get all in with a good hand . Obv some aggressive players can be better than others so some can be dangerous but if you gather enough information you can get comfortable playing against them.

 

[km1n]

Yes i believe they are the most annoying one to be but they are the mosr profitable too.
U must find an strategy to try to take them down but they also put in crazy spots that could take all your chips too.
Almost always the first chipleaders are the aggresive ones

 

[TeUnit]

I think it comes down to their balance and how the Hero adapts.

 

[Kinalha]

The correct agressive game, is the most lucrative style in poker. Be a nit for all life, and you never win constantly relevant money

 

[MrPokerVerse]

Would need to know what is classified and categorized as aggression. Many aggressive players like to see many flops and over bet, those are the least dangerous and can be picked off. Someone aggressively chasing hands are not as lethal to you're stack than the skilled player who can extract chips. From MTT play, those type of players are easily recognized and to predictable to be much of a threat.

 

[hilary antonik filho]

Aggressive players even to themselves are dangerous, you have patience, know how to wait and have a good hand and end up reducing his chips, soon he will stop with the aggressiveness

 

[Falai_san]

If you are afraid to play.
You will always lose.
That's why you have to take risks sometimes

 

[Gallarado777]

if an aggressive player is a fish, it's easy to play against them. If an aggressive player is in moderation and you know how to play where necessary, it's harder to play against such players, but you can just wait for a strong hand and act from 10 hands 2 times you'll lose, as can be seen in the headzap when players play 1-1, you'll have to play aggressively against an aggressive player

 

[olejean]

A GOOD player is always dangerous.

 

[Michel_11]

An aggressive player doesn't have to be a maniac.

It will always be very difficult to play against a good aggressive player.

 

[10gerka]

On the contrary, when a player is aggressive, we can adapt and get the most value out of him when we have a hand.

 

[Gutshot Gus]

He who bets the most chips wins!
Aggressive players are tough to beat, but at the same time they fall the hardest.
Study them and take notes of how and when they are out of line and send them to the rail.

 

[Berandir]

When identifying an aggressive player, choose to play in the best positions, with a stronger range of hands. These players tend to play more hands than normal.

 

[robbieb]

I would say the most dangerous players are the intentionally passive aggressive players. If they’re super aggressive for some hands and slow play others, they are very hard to get a read on. Just aggressive players can really get burned bad if luck is not their side. You wait till you get something like a set, hoping they have an AA’s and slow play them. But they do have a way of diverting the table’s attention to them, allowing other players to go unnoticed.

 

[CataRouillet]

I think very aggressive players are dangerous because it is difficult to read the hand they may have. Since they have a very wide preflop range.