cese1962
Rock Star
Silver Level
In your opinion, can work like playing poker promote or favor the development of illnesses - whether physical, mental or social?
In my humble opinion this is the craze that exists for a group that controls the laws and regulations of a society, wanting to determine what is good or what is bad for third parties, and in order not to appear too severe, they make use of social arguments, or of generosity, as if they were better able to take care of the life of the third party, than he himself, and the attitude of the third party can only bring harm to himself.
They carry this with a poor argument, as a rule, to try to prove that that human being is not going to do him any good when doing that.
It is not a rule-free society. The human being must be prevented from harming others, and must have as much information and knowledge as that society can give him, so that he can make the best choices for his life and suffer the consequences, consciously, or , the more conscious he is.
Why do I get this credit? Because when you say, "Can't it hurt him?"
- How many people do you know who got screwed because they married the wrong person? He was a happy guy, fun, loose, full, in short, happy, and that today you feel a sad, bitter, anguished guy, because he chose the wrong person to marry. The solution then would be to lead a campaign to prevent people from getting married? Would it be this?
- How many people do you know who started a business, spent 30 years saving money to start their own business, and came to lose everything ... So, are we going to stop people from starting their own businesses?
- And I'm going to exaggerate a little more about the old saying, because people jumped off the bridge ... So we have to stop building bridges ...
So, what some people try to make me believe is that poker can bring harm to your life, so we have to stop this activity.
Wouldn't it be right, everything can or cannot bring harm to your life? Opening a business, getting married, (...).
- The problem is not in the bridge, but how that asshole used the bridge to end his life;
- The problem is not in the marriage, but in what that relationship caused damage to those two people;
- The problem is not the "poker institution", but what some people are prone to "decivilization";
If people end their lives by doing the wrong things, either because they apply the wrong thing in their veins, or because they marry the wrong person, or because they open the wrong business. Can't we look at it as compulsive behaviors?
The game is just another element to choose or not, that fits the decisions of our life.
Someone can get a gun and go shooting, or they can go to drugs, drink beer, they can get married and end their life and family, they can play poker, ...
In my opinion, we have to stop being ridiculous and pathetic to think that poker is a transcendental element to end someone's life, as it is not marriage or anything else, that is, if the human being is in his health full mental, and that is what I want to get to, the human being, out of his mental health, will burst with his life with whatever he wants, and the human being in his full mental health will have to deal with all the time decisions that push you for better or for worse.
What's your opinion?
In my humble opinion this is the craze that exists for a group that controls the laws and regulations of a society, wanting to determine what is good or what is bad for third parties, and in order not to appear too severe, they make use of social arguments, or of generosity, as if they were better able to take care of the life of the third party, than he himself, and the attitude of the third party can only bring harm to himself.
They carry this with a poor argument, as a rule, to try to prove that that human being is not going to do him any good when doing that.
It is not a rule-free society. The human being must be prevented from harming others, and must have as much information and knowledge as that society can give him, so that he can make the best choices for his life and suffer the consequences, consciously, or , the more conscious he is.
Why do I get this credit? Because when you say, "Can't it hurt him?"
- How many people do you know who got screwed because they married the wrong person? He was a happy guy, fun, loose, full, in short, happy, and that today you feel a sad, bitter, anguished guy, because he chose the wrong person to marry. The solution then would be to lead a campaign to prevent people from getting married? Would it be this?
- How many people do you know who started a business, spent 30 years saving money to start their own business, and came to lose everything ... So, are we going to stop people from starting their own businesses?
- And I'm going to exaggerate a little more about the old saying, because people jumped off the bridge ... So we have to stop building bridges ...
So, what some people try to make me believe is that poker can bring harm to your life, so we have to stop this activity.
Wouldn't it be right, everything can or cannot bring harm to your life? Opening a business, getting married, (...).
- The problem is not in the bridge, but how that asshole used the bridge to end his life;
- The problem is not in the marriage, but in what that relationship caused damage to those two people;
- The problem is not the "poker institution", but what some people are prone to "decivilization";
If people end their lives by doing the wrong things, either because they apply the wrong thing in their veins, or because they marry the wrong person, or because they open the wrong business. Can't we look at it as compulsive behaviors?
The game is just another element to choose or not, that fits the decisions of our life.
Someone can get a gun and go shooting, or they can go to drugs, drink beer, they can get married and end their life and family, they can play poker, ...
In my opinion, we have to stop being ridiculous and pathetic to think that poker is a transcendental element to end someone's life, as it is not marriage or anything else, that is, if the human being is in his health full mental, and that is what I want to get to, the human being, out of his mental health, will burst with his life with whatever he wants, and the human being in his full mental health will have to deal with all the time decisions that push you for better or for worse.
What's your opinion?
