one week 1 million hands tracked

[storman99]

over 99% of all hands tracked for .50-1$nl for the week of 2-20 to2-27
over all



By storman99
top winners for that week


By storman99

from 2-21 to 2-27-08 tell 3:00am it should be 100% tracked.
missed tracking 2-27-08 from 3:00am to 6:45am and from 6:45am to 4:15pm tracked around 70%
from 4:15pm on 100% tracked

 

[Inscore77]

Good grief, how many hours and tables are you playing?

 

[tenbob]

Data-mining.

 

[pantin007]

overbet56 is damn sick, 2500$ profit over 6K hands and only 73 seccions, thats 1 major heater going at over 20 BB/100
damn sick

 

[NineLions]

What's the objective?

If you're playing or planning to play that game/level I could see looking for opponent's stats, or, going into some kind of analysis of playing styles and how successful they are with respect to that site, that level, that type of game.

Otherwise, ?

 

[zachvac]

I assume the "hours" category is table-hours, since otherwise the one guy would be playing an average of 45 hours/day.

 

[zachvac]

The sick part is that they made over 450k in rake JUST AT 100nl 6MAX.

Also anyone notice the -4.18 as the average BB/100? That average without the rake would be 0. Does that mean that the rake takes an average of 4.18 BB/100 hands from every player?

 

[smd173]

How about the Winners vs. Losers? 31 to 68%?!

 

[icemonkey9]

Yeah the Winners vs Losers stat was the most eye-popping to me. It means that roughly two thirds of all players are losing their money to one-third of players. It's not a split of 50-50 or even close. Pretty telling, isn't it?

But this is great information for data mining purposes, for example, if you planned on moving up to this level of competition you would have the HUD stats for all the players, and assuming you knew how to use that info (for example, I really don't at this point) you could use it to your advantage.

 

[Effexor]

This is one of the more fascinating posts I've seen.

I assume you are using an automated table opener? What one by chance?

 

[pigpen02]

Yeah the Winners vs Losers stat was the most eye-popping to me. It means that roughly two thirds of all players are losing their money to one-third of players. It's not a split of 50-50 or even close. Pretty telling, isn't it?

Losers don't lose only to winners. Remember the rake. The house wins 100% of the time.

 

[smd173]

Losers don't lose only to winners. Remember the rake. The house wins 100% of the time.

Yeah, but even with the rake, I would expect it to be at least 45-55. 31-68 is more than just rake.

 

[zachvac]

Yeah, but even with the rake, I would expect it to be at least 45-55. 31-68 is more than just rake.

I would expect with 0 rake for there to be a change. The winners will probably continue to play more, and the losers would quit overall. There are people that makes thousands a year (including people here). How many people do you know that consistently lose thousands every year? I'm sure there are some, but most people would quit after losing thousands a year playing, or at least move down.