Since when did poker Bots surpass humans?

[Lizzzie711]

NLHM is complex enough that a "perfect" strategy has not yet been developed. It wasn't until the late nineties that software could consistently beat a strong chess player. Now, computer software can beat the best Grand Masters. But chess is a game of "complete information", unlike poker. There are effectively an infinite number of variables, situations, and different playing styles. NLHM software (like PokerSnowie) can play at a reasonably high level, but a good player good could start to beat it after playing it enough and adjusting enough. Eventually, a "heuristic program", i.e., a program that learns, will be developed. I wouldn't worry about it though as there will always be plenty of humans out there to exploit....

 

[white_vision0]

Same was for chess, but now there are some that can beat the best chess players in the world. It won't be long till very good bots will be accessible enough to program (opensource codes and so on ) and implement in games like poker.

 

[VITOS]

Core modules for the bot: getting Information - receive information from the client, which is necessary for decision-making; includes - our cards, opponents bets, stack sizes, providing a long bread, etc. Decisions -.. algorithm for deciding whether action bot quite logical tasks and separate subject, so we will consider it in the next article in this series. User Action Simulation - simulation of a user clicking buttons, imitation mouse movements. Maybe soon the entire online poker world will be bots and auction on the stock exchange. Despite the claims of the Roma, the bots of benefit to them. Favorable, because they are many and often put, but simply and earn a rail rooms.

 

[Polytarp]

Computer Poker Research Group - University of Alberta



Here is a good link to follow up with. Bots exist, punto. And they have weaknesses. As long as you have the patience (and a decent bankroll) it will be a 50/50 game so at the very least you will earn some points.