How long does it take to become a winning player?

XXPXXP

XXPXXP

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 7, 2012
Total posts
5,511
Awards
2
Chips
0
something i hear very often is that ALOT of people are break even over a huge period of time or just slight winners. The thing that makes the huge change in their carreer is winning a big tourney.

Cause this is a way to quickly move up limits(cause ur rolled properly) and be able to play in pots that are actually worth playing.

Because in the micros, you have to play thousands of pots to win 10,20 or like ,50 bucks max.

So it takes soooo much time and feffort to make baby steps.

When you win a big tourney( 20k and above),thats when you can go sit down and play100NL comfortably and im sure this is a level where you can make a living off of.

is this right? or is this a two way knife? meaning that if you suddenly find yourself with a huge roll and go play 100NL,will u go broke fast?

is it better to work your way up there? or is it possible to jump right in there and learn it quick?( if ur comfortably rolled for it)

this is partly true and reasonable.

like said in a book "poker blue print"?

if you are young and able to suffer from XXX to 0, SEVERAL TIMES.

it is fine to try to build your bankroll aggressively. you may play till you touch your limit.

:D:D:D
 
XXPXXP

XXPXXP

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 7, 2012
Total posts
5,511
Awards
2
Chips
0
time and effort and studying, are not going to guarantee anything.

Im not winning consistently and ive been playing for more than two years. thats why i made this thread. Its like asking, am i retarded or smthng?


it is not how many u wining.

it is how many you have improved as time goes by.

if you correct 2 or 3 mistakes everyday, two years are far enough for u to be a good player.

so poker is making good decision, the more good decision you make, you win. all you are going to focus on is the skills to making decision itself.

no mistakes, huge chips, one mistake, you may lost your chips by a even single hand by NLHE.

GL.:D:D:D
 
Four Dogs

Four Dogs

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Total posts
4,298
Awards
1
Chips
17
time and effort and studying, are not going to guarantee anything.

Im not winning consistently and ive been playing for more than two years. thats why i made this thread. Its like asking, am i retarded or smthng?
I didn't catch this the first time. Dude, you're not retarded. The vast vast majority of people lose more than they win. But I totally know how you feel. Two years seems like an eternity but it's not. Also, the rake is a killer at the low limits. There are some pros who make a living playing 10/20 Hold 'em who can't beat .05/.10.

But seriously, who cares? Just keep playing, and learning and if it happens it happens. And if it doesn't? Well, you're far from alone.

GL:)
 
dj11

dj11

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Total posts
23,189
Awards
9
Chips
0
Perhaps the better question is when does profit become the primary reason for playing? I know in my case profit is still not a primary reason for playing. It wasn't 20 years ago when I would occasionally go to a casino with the intent of getting $50 worth of entertainment. It surely wasn't in the early days of internet play.

While almost everyone here has ragged me about my poker philosophy, and my use of play money games to learn nearly all the basics and most of the advanced stuff about the game, I still find myself playing play money RUSH, or ZOOM, or even a regular play money tourney. I still maintain, that the only thing impossible to learn in play money poker is the 'scared money' aspect of gambling. Old saying is that if you can afford to flush money down the drain, you can afford poker. Well, change that to if you ENJOY flushing money down the drain then you could do that or play poker.

I am not trying to make a living on poker, I enjoy the game. A day of live poker around here (L.A.) is still cheaper than a day at Disneyland, or probably a date night at the latest movie. After a big tourney win, I typically find myself at big cash tables where I am a losing player, and always remind myself I am a loser at cash tables. I also find I have less fun losing at cash tables than I do at tourney's.

Vinny, you mentioned you did well at tourney's, but think the holy grail is ring?

My philosophy allows me to explore the theories of poker freely. A grinder has to learn the moves, and apply them fearlessly to succeed.

In my case I also think that over the years, my ring game villains have marked me as a fish, and play me that way. I think it is not something that can change much, even if my game has changed. If those villains play me that way, rather than the way they would play an unknown, my game would need to be extra special to overcome my ring game history.

So, all that (^^^) is prelude to my suggestion that if you feel some need to be a grinder, you should think that you need a pro coach, and pay him as if you were a golfer and wanted Tiger to teach you, or at least a golfer who realized a glitch in his swing and was willing to pay someone to work on that glitch.
 
vinylspiros

vinylspiros

PIRANHA-------->< (((º>
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Total posts
4,393
Awards
1
Chips
1
Perhaps the better question is when does profit become the primary reason for playing? I know in my case profit is still not a primary reason for playing. It wasn't 20 years ago when I would occasionally go to a casino with the intent of getting $50 worth of entertainment. It surely wasn't in the early days of internet play.

While almost everyone here has ragged me about my poker philosophy, and my use of play money games to learn nearly all the basics and most of the advanced stuff about the game, I still find myself playing play money RUSH, or ZOOM, or even a regular play money tourney. I still maintain, that the only thing impossible to learn in play money poker is the 'scared money' aspect of gambling. Old saying is that if you can afford to flush money down the drain, you can afford poker. Well, change that to if you ENJOY flushing money down the drain then you could do that or play poker.

I am not trying to make a living on poker, I enjoy the game. A day of live poker around here (L.A.) is still cheaper than a day at Disneyland, or probably a date night at the latest movie. After a big tourney win, I typically find myself at big cash tables where I am a losing player, and always remind myself I am a loser at cash tables. I also find I have less fun losing at cash tables than I do at tourney's.

Vinny, you mentioned you did well at tourney's, but think the holy grail is ring?

My philosophy allows me to explore the theories of poker freely. A grinder has to learn the moves, and apply them fearlessly to succeed.

In my case I also think that over the years, my ring game villains have marked me as a fish, and play me that way. I think it is not something that can change much, even if my game has changed. If those villains play me that way, rather than the way they would play an unknown, my game would need to be extra special to overcome my ring game history.

So, all that (^^^) is prelude to my suggestion that if you feel some need to be a grinder, you should think that you need a pro coach, and pay him as if you were a golfer and wanted Tiger to teach you, or at least a golfer who realized a glitch in his swing and was willing to pay someone to work on that glitch.
DJ. another masterpiece post on your behalf. thnk you.

Im going to answer the question related to tourneys and cash.

I really believe and am pretty sure that im a half descent tourney player. but because i would like to reach a point where i am making good profit on a regular basis, i dont think tourney is the way to go.(due to the fact that i mentioned the words "REGULAR BASIS").

From what i understand, none of the serious grinders or professionals are tourney players strictly. I could be wrong here.

The thing is, that although i love my tourneys and do appreciate the andrenaline rush they provide,assuming you have a deep run, i believe that the play is really mechanical after a point and luck plays a huge part after the blinds exceed a certain point.

In cash, the good player will see his net won line go upwards . the bad player will see it go downwards.

also in cash games, your playing your hard earned cash, so there is no room for mistakes. every decision must be based on various factors where in a tourney its pretty straightforward:

"Hmmmm... lemme see, i have 8BB left its folded down to me , i have pocket 8's,god be with me"

i just think cash is harder and more challenging. the problem is that right now, i dont have the cash to play the cash limits that i wanna be playing. And i cant really build it up from playing 2NL and moving up levels. i dont have that kind of discipline.

cause ive done it in the past and i really cant do it again. its tooo straining.

Best case scenario for me right now would be to win a tourney. 2K and above and go play some 50NL properly rolled.
that is one of my goals for 2013.

and to be honest, lately im playing alot of tourneys and im running pretty good in most of them. just havent hit the big score yet.(im sure its due)

Tonight im going to play the big 109 on stars. im depositing 100 euros and if i win, then im going to be on good track. if i lose, theres another 100 bucks that i didnt play within my BR.oh well....
 
U

utilizatorus

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Jun 5, 2013
Total posts
14
Chips
0
nice topic, thanks! in my oppinion, not Everyone is born to play Poker. :) no matter how much you learn, how disciplined you are or how clever.. it takes so many things to have to be a succes one. aggresivity, a kind of "filthy" character, escuse me for this. :D of course, there are some players who made it big from the first 3, 4 months, and others are beggining to win gradually maybe after 2 or even 3 years. it takes a lot of discipline and cleverness, or if the clever side doesn't represent you, than you have to be a little "dirty", a little bit of a lier, a little bit of a perverted. it's strange what i'm saying but you will NEVER see a priest winning at the tables. and than, you have to be somehow of a persuasive type. " i know that i'm playing for many months without a big winning but i'm better and better and i will continue to improve"! have this menthality and you're much closer to the bright sides of the poker. of course, the experience of some years would help. discipline and courage, that's all that matters in the end.
 
starting_at_the_bottom

starting_at_the_bottom

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Total posts
2,665
Awards
1
Chips
7
As soon as you learn you are not as good as you think you are, then that's when it all begins.

When I realised this I knew I needed to put hours into learning the game, and of course only sitting at tables with players worse than myself.
 
D

DonkeyFish

Rising Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Total posts
19
Chips
0
I've been playing about 4 years and I still have weaknesses to overcome
 
C

chrispitt

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
May 27, 2013
Total posts
9
Chips
0
First of all very nice question and it is hard to say how much time it takes because all depend on game.
 
Samango

Samango

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
1,014
Awards
1
Chips
0
i just think cash is harder and more challenging. the problem is that right now, i dont have the cash to play the cash limits that i wanna be playing. And i cant really build it up from playing 2NL and moving up levels. i dont have that kind of discipline.
This is a mistake IMO. This is exactly what you should be doing. You're right, cash is hard and you need to learn the ropes, then move up steadily. I think you said earlier that you are not winning overall so getting to the point where you are a winner at the lowest stakes is the first step. I don't believe there are any shortcuts. If you want to play cash because you want to be a grinder with a steady win-rate, then you have to do this.

cause ive done it in the past and i really cant do it again. its tooo straining.

Best case scenario for me right now would be to win a tourney. 2K and above and go play some 50NL properly rolled.
that is one of my goals for 2013.
This would probably end in disaster. I think you are a decent player with great potential, but how do you imagine that playing higher stakes is going to turn you from overall losing to overall winning. Sorry it isn't.

and to be honest, lately im playing alot of tourneys and im running pretty good in most of them. just havent hit the big score yet.(im sure its due)

Tonight im going to play the big 109 on stars. im depositing 100 euros and if i win, then im going to be on good track. if i lose, theres another 100 bucks that i didnt play within my BR.oh well....
This may your biggest mistake of all. Good Bankroll Management, as you have heard many times before, is essential, and fundamental to being a winning player, and you have to start believing it and practising it.

Being a bankroll nit and having passable skills :icon_geek has enabled me to grow a roll from 0, and then stay consistently profitable for the past five years, while also exploring new forms and styles of poker.
BRM is sooo important.
Start now and watch your BR grow ;)

Good Luck
 
Last edited:
vinylspiros

vinylspiros

PIRANHA-------->< (((º>
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Total posts
4,393
Awards
1
Chips
1
Being a bankroll nit and having passable skills :icon_geek has enabled me to grow a roll from 0, and then stay consistently profitable for the past five years, while also exploring new forms and styles of poker.
BRM is sooo important.
Start now and watch your BR grow ;)

Good Luck
ty, you are absolutely right. i agree with you here. good to be reminded about the importance of BRM. good tips here. It's easier said than done but ill definitely give it a try.
 
Aces2w1n

Aces2w1n

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Total posts
5,781
Chips
0
ty, you are absolutely right. i agree with you here. good to be reminded about the importance of BRM. good tips here. It's easier said than done but ill definitely give it a try.

*******Game selection********
 
J

Jerry_B

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2013
Total posts
4
Chips
0
Playing on the few remaining U.S. facing sites makes it very obvious that "Game Selection" as Aces2w1n mentions is a large part of your expected win rate. The micros there are filled with regulars and you'll frequently see tables with literally 0 to 7% flop action.

One of the toughest skills to develop is analyzing your skill compared to others at the table. To paraphrase one of the poker books "If you're the 9th best player in the world sitting with the top 8 players, you're still -EV at the game."

Don't think of yourself as a bad or good player, think of yourself as having skills somewhere on a scale compared to the other players at the table. Your EV on any table varies depending on the other players. It's just hard to gauge your skill.

You should also consider how many hours/hands rather than years played. I've played and studied for over 2 years, but only get to play a few hours per week, so compared to any grinder I've actually got about 1 month's experience.

And if you like tournaments, there are people who grind tournaments for a living. Check out some of the results on officialpokerrankings.com.

Have fun and good luck.
 
Top