.01/.02$ or .02/.05 at Full Tilt Ever???

Will Full Tilt ever have micro limit cash games

  • NO

    Votes: 10 71.4%
  • YES

    Votes: 5 35.7%
  • micros are for losers

    Votes: 4 28.6%

  • Total voters
    14
  • Poll closed .
KingCurtis

KingCurtis

Legend
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Total posts
9,945
Awards
1
will it ever happen????
I think they should def. lol
 
premierplayer

premierplayer

Visionary
Joined
Feb 19, 2007
Total posts
504
Isnt rake on FT a little higher than other sites? I don't know I think those limits are worthless anyways.
 
wsorbust

wsorbust

Cardschat Elite
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Total posts
2,425
It probably depends how you view it. I wouldn't say they're worthless. I voted for "Losers" because it's pure hell, believe me, but you can surely be a "winner" in these micro limits and make it out into greater land. People/I have increased BR through them when starting with nothing, because what choice do you have? I think you're in the same situation KingCurtis...and I'm surely not looking to deposit anytime soon. I'm sure sites enjoy making back their free roll winnings easily through rake in these things along with the micro sngos.

If you can deposit maybe $100 or so, the .02/.05 at stars is pretty decent at times for what it is. The .01/.02 are most of the time a craps shoot IMO, but it's to be expected.

My thinking is that Full Tilt likes to think they have a better quality of play coming to their tables and these micros aid in keeping the loose donkey play at other sites such as PS. What one site chooses not to do, another takes advantage of. If they didn't add those micros to their site after the whole poker crisis, I wouldn't expect them to do it anytime soon, that's for sure.
 
Last edited:
DetroitJimmy

DetroitJimmy

Legend
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Total posts
1,045
I am new at FT.Glad to see there are no "micros".The fish will just flock to the lowest limits,where I will be for a while.

No they will probably never have micros,why should they with the rake they receive.
 
aliengenius

aliengenius

Cardschat Elite
Joined
Jul 7, 2006
Total posts
4,596
I voted yes/no, just because I could. $10NL is already pretty "micro" imo.
 
N.D.

N.D.

Visionary
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Total posts
930
I thought I saw 5c/10c at FT. To me that's microstakes. Unfortunately I'm used to UB.

I'm wondering. Since I'm used to 5c/10c but at a different site. Would the $2 I normally sit with have to be $10? Strange question, but I am curious.
 
KingCurtis

KingCurtis

Legend
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Total posts
9,945
Awards
1
I thought I saw 5c/10c at FT. To me that's microstakes. Unfortunately I'm used to Ultimatebet.

I'm wondering. Since I'm used to 5c/10c but at a different site. Would the $2 I normally sit with have to be $10? Strange question, but I am curious.

min buy in is still 2 $ at FT i think i ussually buy in for 3$
 
N.D.

N.D.

Visionary
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Total posts
930
Oh I meant because plays supposed to be a lot tighter/tougher there. If it's not then feel free to disregard my question. I only played there once for cash. Capped NLHE with freeroll winnings but it was a mistake. It turns out All-in is pretty much meaningless, cap or no cap.
 
Related FullTilt Guides: English | Deutsch | Nederlands | Español | Português | FullTilt Casino | FullTilt Mobile
Top