loquillowin
Enthusiast
Silver Level
Hello. I have a few years of playing and studying. I have always received advice and purchased (or no) knowledge through data from a HUD.
After this time I would like to entangle you learned in this way with his experiences at the tables. Let me explain:
An opponent that pays a overbet (3xpot) All-in on the flop with top pair to fold cbet esteemed him? I if paying by mid pair KT6? I if done with FD?
What I mean is if there is a learning style that is based on this type of analysis rather than a HUD.
I think in this way we can adjust more style game opponents with a smaller number of hands. It is clear that if we 100k hands of a rival, a good HUD has said this is going to very many exactly. But with few hands to analyze the movements of rivals I see it more accurate.
We must also take into account the number of tables. If we play 4-6 we can see it and use it. Playing 24 tables I think not
That think?:hmpf:
After this time I would like to entangle you learned in this way with his experiences at the tables. Let me explain:
An opponent that pays a overbet (3xpot) All-in on the flop with top pair to fold cbet esteemed him? I if paying by mid pair KT6? I if done with FD?
What I mean is if there is a learning style that is based on this type of analysis rather than a HUD.
I think in this way we can adjust more style game opponents with a smaller number of hands. It is clear that if we 100k hands of a rival, a good HUD has said this is going to very many exactly. But with few hands to analyze the movements of rivals I see it more accurate.
We must also take into account the number of tables. If we play 4-6 we can see it and use it. Playing 24 tables I think not
That think?:hmpf: