I think we all guys need to stop complaining about bad luck. This is such a mental thing. It can destroy you from inside. I truly know it is hard to deal with bad beats and lots of good players sometimes have trouble with it as well.
Best to sit a few out. Good time for a restroom break.The cooler thing is also something psychological. You will never forget a bad beat and it might trace you for the next few hands, or the rest of the evening.
Yeah, this is kind of my point. If beating 1/2 or micro online means having to rely on lucky runs, then is it really beatable for a profit? Or more theoretically, unless you have some magic system to out-dumbass players at low stakes, is it better to try to skip them as fast as possible. That was my goal, get the F out of 1/2 and move to 2/5. I had a poker coach tell me as much, that at my skill level, if I cant afford 2/5, I should sit 1/2/5, since it has the worst of the 2/5 players and the better range of 1/2 which can be a juicy crowd. But, when I get close to grinding my way out of the 1/2 muck, here comes the variance hammer and I'm back to lameville.
Almost every story I hear from pros is that they hit some lucky big first win, tournament or run of live games, that staked them up the ladder. Grinders I see at 1/2 (I dont count myself among them, I have a jobby-job but want added income from poker, so its not my main thing) are always struggling. Its as if they gave up on the dream and got lazy, grinding out a tiny living from the lowest casino stakes available. *
* Sorry, not meaning to berate grinders at 1/2, just saying from what I see it isnt a particularly easy lifestyle.
Listen to me carefully.
Playing tight doesn't work anymore. You NEED to become brutally aggressive when you do play.
I doubt this very much. Judging from the starting hands I've seen, it doesn't look very much like they've been getting lessons in starting hand value. They'll even go all-in with some of the goddamnedest hands.TAG is still the fundamental concept to profit but the AG is much more significant than the T now, you need to truly scare people off because people in a hand all have good starting hands nowadays, starting hand education is the norm it's mid hand domination that is still not taught well in poker schools.
Be a psychopath and you will profit. Do not be aggressive to make more money, be aggressive to make anyone fold or if they call then you pretty much are beat so back down (unless you fancy a shot at it or whatever).
That's always been true, and that's how I've always played.
I doubt this very much. Judging from the starting hands I've seen, it doesn't look very much like they've been getting lessons in starting hand value. They'll even go all-in with some of the goddamnedest hands.
If you want to win, then you need to adjust to how they're playing, get a line on their play, watch showdowns and figure out their likely ranges from various positions, and pay attention both to what you see and what you don't see. You also need to see who are the thinking players, and, yes, they do exist even as low as 10NL.
Being mindlessly aggro is a sure ticket to Brokesville.
Being passive is a sure ticket to losing more in blinds alone than you ever make overall.