Open-limping: Is it so bad?

rock0001

rock0001

Legend
Bronze Level
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Total posts
1,098
Awards
19
Chips
62
i dont think limping is a bad decision at all. however it depends on the strenght of your hand, and also, its important to consider if the table is tight or loose. if it is tight limping with a big pair could have some advantages, cause if you raise, there are more chances, for your opponents to fold the hand however if the table is more loose limping with small pair or speculative hands can give you + ev, in the long run because if you hit a set, straight or flush it will be greatly rewarding for you.
 
JusSumguy

JusSumguy

Chipmonger
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Total posts
4,271
Awards
2
Chips
0
if you hit a set, straight or flush, you've already lost value by missing the raise.

-
 
trekmaster

trekmaster

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Total posts
332
Chips
0
Trap plays require the limp sometimes and, you can get all of a players chips in the right situation with this play so no I dont think that it a bad play all of the time.
 
L

loomis311

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Total posts
173
Chips
0
i believe it all depends on the table you are at and how they are reacting. if opponents are always raising your limps and barreling you, then i think it is bad. you could try to balance it by also limping big pairs, but it could make the hand harder to play post flop. instead of limping you could try min raising.
 
hackmeplz

hackmeplz

Sleep Faster
Silver Level
Joined
May 1, 2012
Total posts
2,282
Awards
1
Chips
2
I experimented for a bit having an open limp range strictly from UTG and UTG+1 at 6m. It consisted of KK+/22-66/A6-A9s/AKs. I was having trouble deciding which hands to l/r as a "bluff" (aka not KK+) at the start no one was adjusting well they were isolating and folding like 95% when I l/r (and the other 5% when I did get to see showdown they just had KK+ themselves). Actually given the other hands are hands that benefit from going multiway maybe we should introduce a few more hands we'd fold preflop and open limp them purely for the free money we get from l/r, maybe stuff like 34-67s?

But anyway the point is in the end I realized I was spending a ton of effort/thought on this spot and I wasn't gaining a ton of ev out of it, plus you have to make up for the additional rake you'll pay due to seeing a lot more flops. I just don't think it's worth all the extra trouble when you can just play with no open limping range and still do fine.
 
Thinker_145

Thinker_145

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Total posts
848
Awards
1
Chips
1
if you hit a set, straight or flush, you've already lost value by missing the raise.

-
And what about the fact that you have also saved alot of money by not raising every time you play a hand? Raising pre-flop with a speculative hand, missing the flop as is mostly the case and then following with a C-bet only to find that your opponent is not going anywhere costs alot of money in the long run.
 
dmorris68

dmorris68

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
May 27, 2008
Total posts
6,788
Awards
2
Chips
0
And what about the fact that you have also saved alot of money by not raising every time you play a hand? Raising pre-flop with a speculative hand, missing the flop as is mostly the case and then following with a C-bet only to find that your opponent is not going anywhere costs alot of money in the long run.
Actually, passive play will almost never earn as much as aggression (properly applied). Limping weak hands and inevitably folding is likely to cost you more in the long term than raising with a tighter range and using aggression to your benefit. That kind of passive play becomes a slow but steady spew. You'll get more value with your good hands against weaker players that don't like folding, and you'll narrow their range when they do call. And thanks to fold equity, especially combined with position, you'll often get better hands to fold. Fold equity and initiative are very important aspects of winning poker, and when you limp/call you have neither. You're not narrowing your opponents range, so you're flying blind, and you're giving off a huge tell that you're not in love with your hand.

Losses from passive play like limp/folding is the type of leak you can pretty easily use a tracker report to uncover. That's why trackers are so valuable to the serious poker student. The value isn't from the HUD, it's from the ability to profile yourself and identify leaks like this.
 
Snakmacher

Snakmacher

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Total posts
530
Chips
0
Even with strong hand if you just limp you can still loose... limping is same as sitting-out with one difference you can loose faster and more chips... If you have nuts and you knew that if you raised all would fold than yes keep limping and after decent raise push all-in... But in late tournament there is no place for limping unless you would like to end in the tournament...
 
R

RaisingYa

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 28, 2013
Total posts
48
Chips
0
I don't agree that open limping is a bad play. It really depends on the composition of the table. If the table is aggressive open limping may cause others to limp as well. Someone in later position may raise and you can re pop it. I try to stay away from blanket statements that open limping is always bad etc, since poker is so situational.
 
dmorris68

dmorris68

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
May 27, 2008
Total posts
6,788
Awards
2
Chips
0
I don't agree that open limping is a bad play. It really depends on the composition of the table. If the table is aggressive open limping may cause others to limp as well. Someone in later position may raise and you can re pop it. I try to stay away from blanket statements that open limping is always bad etc, since poker is so situational.

Open limping with any frequency is definitely bad play. But as I said...

As with anything in poker, nothing is 100%. We can't say *never* open-limp but we can say *almost never.* In general it's a bad idea, but in certain situations it's called for.

However for the typical micro stakes player asking this question, it's best not to appear to be validating what is most likely bad play. It's best to stick to the basic fundamental ABC style of tight aggressive play, which says to open a narrow enough range that you should always be coming in for a raise. Trying to trick or level your opponents into doing something, especially when you're at a basic level yourself, is not going to work often enough to counter the spew that happens when it doesn't. Getting the idea that it's okay to limp "sometimes" will lead most beginning players to do it way too much, so it should generally be discouraged up front.
 
R

RaisingYa

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 28, 2013
Total posts
48
Chips
0
Open limping with any frequency is definitely bad play. But as I said...



However for the typical micro stakes player asking this question, it's best not to appear to be validating what is most likely bad play. It's best to stick to the basic fundamental ABC style of tight aggressive play, which says to open a narrow enough range that you should always be coming in for a raise. Trying to trick or level your opponents into doing something, especially when you're at a basic level yourself, is not going to work often enough to counter the spew that happens when it doesn't. Getting the idea that it's okay to limp "sometimes" will lead most beginning players to do it way too much, so it should generally be discouraged up front.
When you put it that way I would agree that in general if you are at a lower stake and a beginner player the limp would be considered bad. You would be much better off either raising or folding .
 
B

baudib1

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
6,635
Chips
0
If you want to play a hand, raise. Why is it so hard to understand? Stop being a fish.
 
Aces2w1n

Aces2w1n

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Total posts
5,781
Chips
0
I don' know about that but with limping small PP from early position your not really giving your self a chance to win unless you hit a set.

If you limp wit 33 and flop comes A-j-4 what are you going to represent in this spot? by limping you took a big Ace out of your range and opponent may question if you would bet with a J here, so now your stuck with a little pair of 3's with little chance of winning

If you raise your pocket 3's pre flop 1.)the BB may not even get to see the hand 2.) if flop comes A-J-4 your giving yourself a chance to win by being able to represent something better then you have.

On the other hand if your limping small- med PP you become predictable and give your opponents a feel where you are at and when you do decide to raise with a big hand it can be harder to get paid off

Also by limping your just asking for some one to squeeze you out of the pot especially if people over limp behind you.

represent J4 lol kidding... I totally agree with you and I never limp in with Small pockets in any position :)
 
rdm4k

rdm4k

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 19, 2013
Total posts
556
Chips
0
the limp is the raise of the future :D (said the old wise)

Btw depend from the game u playing. I mean, if playing a cash game (what i suppose because of the section) 6max it's pretty horrible limping anything.
We can overlimp some hands on mwp but rarely open limp.

Imho in a 9/10 handed it's not that bad having an open limping range coz of the tighter dynamics.
 
Akorps

Akorps

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 1, 2008
Total posts
450
Chips
0
limping then having to fold to a raise can put one on tilt :)
 
G

GWU73

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Total posts
785
Chips
0
Limping can be a good play, not just to backraise or because you are overlimping with a small pair. It is not usually the best play but it can be the right play. Sometimes your table will ignore raises and raising only servers to enlarger the pot. Other times you have a hand that stands a real good chance of being a winner even versus an existing raise, but that is too weak to withstand a reraise. Mid pairs can be a good example, say JJ or TT utg vs an aggressive or extremely loose table. Raising is standard, but with many players likely to call or reraise, limping with the intention of flating a raise can be profitable. Not to mention the times you flop a high set that no one seees coming. It is a very sneaky play that minimizes risk with hands that are easy to overplay.It can also be profitable to limp in position with any playable hand if your opponents will stack off with top pair pretty frequently.
 
H

houtlijm

Enthusiast
Platinum Level
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Total posts
74
Chips
0
hmm i think open limping is only a smart choice when you have Aces or Kings. people are way more agressive today then they were a few years ago
 
Top