absoluthamm
<==Poker Face
Silver Level
Well you will likely hear this from guys that have not played microstakes for some time.... or ateast the lower ones!
Yes you are right, atleast there is not a great deal or skill difference between 10NL and 5. But its not just about the differnce in the players you face.
You need to have a LARGE edge over these players to make up for the rake that you pay in order to make a good consistant winrate. This also gives you the psychological advantage you need. When you feel confident and good about the game you are playing, you play well and the beats affect you less.
If you go from merely comfortable beating 2NL (4BB/100) and move up I guarantee that the beats and larger bet sizing will combine and hamper your confidence enough to turn you from a marginal winner into another breakeven frustrated player. It happened to me.... twice.
I played Facebook, then 2NL and then 5NL and am now trying to find my feet at 10.
IMO you shouldnt move up a stake untill you are really destroying the one you are at (5-6BBs over 30k hands)
Also coming from someone who plays the micros and have played a lot at them, 2NL, 5NL and 10NL. There is no substantial difference between them. This isn't coming from some 400NL player, but someone who has seen it firsthand. Now the real difference comes when you go from Facebook(which I personally can't understand why anyone would waste their time on) to any cash game. The biggest thing that YOU will notice when you're moving up is probably that you're getting scared to make the shoves you need to because of the fact that it is going to be for 2x+ more than you're used to shoving with and you're thinking about how long it may have taken you to build that up at your last level.
Also 30K hands isn't a big enough sample to really tell that you're destroying a level. It can tell you that you're doing well at the level, but I've seen many heaters and coolers that have lasted that long.
Another guy that has seen it firsthand and knows that there is no real difference.As someone who has recently played 2nl and 5nl and onto 10nl I have to say there isnt much diff between them all. The basic principal is that your weaknesses aren't being exploited in these games.
Ya, there are less people in 5nl that will just spew their chips to you or go to the river with gutshots but the way you're winning at 2nl wont be any different then at 5nl. Basic fundamental ABC poker is still the way to win at these games and if you dont have as many spewtards you will have more weaktights and you should be able to win a lot more small pots, which really add up.
EDIT:Basically everyone still sucks one way or the other. The ones that you come across that seem pretty good wont be there long anyways cause they move up.
I honestly believe you should not really worry about it. People will tell you it is different but the fact is that it is pretty much the same game and the same rules apply
Mayo and Jag know what they are talking about, they don't say things just to look down on you, shut up and listen to people who know from experience. You arguing with them but wanting others advice is like not taking advice from a pro basketball player on how to play, but listening to a first year middle school player on the topic...The fact of he matter is, that the majority of players over adjust when taking shots/moving up. Most players can admit that when moving up, things don;t always go smoothly, its pretty much the same at every level.
But as Mayo said, playing a 14/12 style at 2nl and winning, is pretty much gonna be winning at 5nl by the same rate. You guys need to get a fking grip and understanding of variance quick and stop thinking "oh shit this is level is well tougher".
Fish are fish, they dont play much differently at 2nl, 10nl or even 100nl, theyre fish ffs. It should be intuitive to you all that as you go up, fish become less and there are more regs. So table select and play with more fish, or learn how to beat regs.