I would think you could win playing those stats, maybe even tighter you could win too. Optimal would be a bit looser of courseHi guys,
what is in your opinion the tightest player can ply at the Zoom 6-max micros in order to be decent winner? In terms of VPIP/PFR/3bet/Fold-to-3bet.
Something like 16/14/5/67 can win at todays micros?
noHi guys,
what is in your opinion the tightest player can ply at the Zoom 6-max micros in order to be decent winner? In terms of VPIP/PFR/3bet/Fold-to-3bet.
Something like 16/14/5/67 can win at todays micros?
How does your response relate to the original poster's question?Analyze your opponent depending on the last 10 hands they played at that table
Forget about stats they can be very decent and lead us to play the numbers, not the game itself. I think stats begin to be useful when we are playing NLHE 50 or higher and we play a large amount of hands.Hi guys,
what is in your opinion the tightest player can ply at the Zoom 6-max micros in order to be decent winner? In terms of VPIP/PFR/3bet/Fold-to-3bet.
Something like 16/14/5/67 can win at todays micros?