Endless bankroll

[otters]

So if money was not an issue and you had an endless bankroll would you play cash games differently to how you play them now?
Would you play less tight?
Would you play every hand regardless?
Or does the skill that you have honed over the years still make you play the right hands at the right time?

 

[almir nicolau]

In my point of view you should play tournament according to your level of knowledge.
High limits practically your profitability will be very low in front of experienced players who treat the game like professionals.
I would play more expensive but according to the limits I can beat.
But I would definitely give a shot at buyins high lol...

 

[georgi krastev]

So if money was not an issue and you had an endless bankroll would you play cash games differently to how you play them now?

Probly yes, but i will change the limit...

Would you play less tight?

I can't (or should not) play more loose than: A2o+; KTo+; QTo+; JTo; T9o; 98o; 87o; 76o; 65o; 45o. (<=But that's a lot of garbage here).

Would you play every hand regardless?

No, this is for specialists...

Or does the skill that you have honed over the years still make you play the right hands at the right time?

If I knew when it was the right time for the right hand I would play it. I don't have that skill.

 

[MrCryJoker]

Of course just the right hands at the right time with the right opponent

 

[MAGICUZ]

If i had an infinite bankroll I would always lose Why play if I already have everything, otherwise I would help people with money with my losses

 

[infonazar]

If I had an infinite bankroll, I wouldn't play because I wouldn't have time for it. I would only withdraw and withdraw money 24/7.

 

[Nikon10000]

If money wasn't an issue and I had an infinite bankroll, my cash game would probably change somewhat. Firstly, I would probably play less tight, as a big bankroll would turn into a riskier one.

 

[steve01991]

i dont like losing money regardless, i would play the same.

 

[Skot_Gy]

Only a robot would play the same even with unlimited bankroll...
A human would play looser nomatter how hard he'd try to keep his regular game.

 

[A kiravio]

So if money was not an issue and you had an endless bankroll would you play cash games differently to how you play them now?
Would you play less tight?
Would you play every hand regardless?
Or does the skill that you have honed over the years still make you play the right hands at the right time?

If it were abstracted from money, I would play by proposing to reach as high as possible to prove to myself that I am good or very good, for satisfaction until something more interesting intervenes. I can't see myself just playing to pass the time pointlessly.

 

[dregan]

In that case, my game would be similar to a play money game. I would not count money and they would replace paper for me.

 

[Tanamita]

I would play tournaments more expensive, I would be a high roller

 

[martDdart]

I am a man of routines so I would keep playing the way I always have done regardless of endless bankroll.

 

[aladar]

Imao! Who like loosing money? Always with the winner hand

 

[Cooking]

If I had an endless bankroll, I would not play cash games. I would play the big tournaments because the feeling of winning a tournament for me is much better than the feeling of having a good cash game session. And I think I would play the same way I do now.

 

[SpanRmonka]

If I had an infinite BR, the point of poker would be a little bit ruined. I would probably play the headline tourneys, online and live when I had the time. I wouldn't just play more loose or play more hands, I would be playing to win still, or there really would be utterly zero point to the game.

Take the top Pros. Technically they have as close to an infinite BR as its possible to get, but they still play a fundamentally solid game

 

[pentazepam]

It would be like playing with play money or in a freeroll. I would be A LOT looser. Seeing flops is fun.

 

[martinoni]

Right hands at the right time always