6 or 9 Seat Table?

[Tricky123bet]

I play only 9max. I started out playing that, and since then I haven't really given 6max much of thought. I tried it sometime but didn't particularly like it.

 

[Bagdalac4ever]

If i have to chose between these two kind of tables, I would always choose the table with 6 people max. It is faster and it is better for me to play.

 

[No1eJoker]

Im like 6 seat table

 

[Bagmet]

No difference in effect if the tournament . but more and more often play 6 local . Especially in the cache the faster the round ends and time is less to hand out .

 

[rari458]

Online I seem to do better in 6, but don't really have a preference. Only ever play smaller games with friends ( 5 or six) compared to at the casino which is always 9

 

[ClickPoker]

Particularly I like the tables of 9, especially because there are more opportunities to play, in my way of seeing

 

[smerald]

Lately I have been a big fan of the 6 Seaters for cash games, get to play more and a wider range of hands. It just seems more fun to me!

 

[evaldas]

On tournaments always playing 9 per table but if there is an option like in cash games or sit&go I prefer 6 players per table, it gives more hans to play and it seams that there is bit faster as well

 

[Dailon Arroyo Blandon]

Hello peaple... i prefer playing table of 9 seats... because the blinds come less often... so you have more hands to play

 

[TeUnit]

think it depends on your skill set, and I think 9 man tables are easier to multitable

 

[redmast]

I do not like tables for 6 players. I try not to sit down for such tables. The fewer players at the table, the more difficult it is to determine the opponent's card and it is necessary to use a bluff. I do not like to bluff. But to play at the last table, where the number of players is reduced to two, I can if necessary.

 

[Dorugremon]

Makes no difference. It all depends on where the most fish players and the deepest stacks are. That could be 6-max one day and full ring the next.

Besides, when three players leave a full ring table, you are playing 6-max.

 

[Antulio francis]

I already think the opposite when less players more the chance to reach the final table 6max is a style of game for aggressors you play more with the cards of opponents and with your own more or less player does not make much difference when you are prepared Based on studies and practice when a good player faces another good player luck and an important factor more when a regular player plays against a bad player or beginner prevails knowledge of studies and practice

 

[ubo]

On line you have the option of sitting at one or the other. I must confess that I prefer a 6 seat table. OK the blinds come around a little faster but you can play more hands per hour. You'd think the size of the pot would be smaller, but it doesn't always work out that way, plus there are more pots to play for.

Personally I prefer 9, I don't know what!
Don't even try never 6.
It is necessary to try ))))))))))) suddenly, too, more like))

 

[malakata19]

I prefer a 9 players table but if the MTT is a turbo type a prefer 6 players table.

 

[dimon4ik89]

The most important difference between short tables is the high speed of the game

The most important difference between short tables is the high speed of the game. Playing at the table for 10 people, you can play about 50 hands per hour. At a short table, this figure can reach 150 hands per hour. Often passing blinds do not allow waiting and playing only hands-monsters. The game on 6-max takes a loose character. Great value in the draw is acquired by small pairs, aces with small kickers and high connectors. Personally, I prefer 6 max, although it all depends on the mood

 

[Fastone2]

I accept that I have to change some things, to play on either table...

 

[Peppinotom]

To play Poker 9 - table
to earn money 6 - table
I don't like 3-table, I prefer the last 3 in MTT

 

[Pharaoh39]

I prefer 6 max, but have no problem with 9 seat.