Mr_Kk13
Enthusiast
Silver Level
- Game
- Hold'em
- Game Format
- No Limit
- Stakes
- $1/$2
- Table Format
- 6-max (6 seats)
- Currency
- $
We would love to hear your thoughts! Click here to take a short survey on your CardsChat experience: Rate Your CardsChat Experience
Forum members receive 10 VIP Chips for participating (follow instructions on form).
Classic case of overbluffing. There was no reason to play this low pair like this but after investing so much into the pot, the aggressor felt it was best to try to bluff a weak value hand. When I would've played more passively, he played aggressively having no means to try to represent whatever it was trying to represent. In my opinion, this is a poor gameplay style.
He didnt know his opponent had Kx, he just happened to run into top of range. All opponents will have some top pair.Representing Kx versus someone who has Kx. Is it correct? I don't think so against SB who isn't going to be defending light and will have plenty of Kx and Ax in their range.
Classic case of overbluffing. There was no reason to play this low pair like this but after investing so much into the pot, the aggressor felt it was best to try to bluff a weak value hand. When I would've played more passively, he played aggressively having no means to try to represent whatever it was trying to represent. In my opinion, this is a poor gameplay style.
I agree with most of this.He didnt know his opponent had Kx, he just happened to run into top of range. All opponents will have some top pair.
Not really, pretty sure this is a GTO thing to bluff some low.pairs. they dont have that much showdown value, can hit a nutted hand and can bluff when logical draws get there such as in this case. He will play QT, AK, JJ, KJ the same so has plenty of value.
I think the play is OK at higher stakes, even if it looks spewy at micros
I think this is not a GTO thing and besides, I'm afraid many of our forum mates are pretty much biased only by this one perspective of GTO gameplay. This could lead to several mistakes in the long run. Allow me to explain myself: I don't understand why GTO had become a religion among poker players or why everything must pass to solvers, such as GTO Wizard. Personally, I like GTO a lot, I use it when I need it, I understand the foundation and the principles of GTO and have nothing against it, don't get me wrong, I'm just saying that many players are using GTO solvers too much.He didnt know his opponent had Kx, he just happened to run into top of range. All opponents will have some top pair.
Not really, pretty sure this is a GTO thing to bluff some low.pairs. they dont have that much showdown value, can hit a nutted hand and can bluff when logical draws get there such as in this case. He will play QT, AK, JJ, KJ the same so has plenty of value.
I think the play is OK at higher stakes, even if it looks spewy at micros