10's Again

[light65536]

Here is a situation came up where obviously the villain represented he had the 8. If he had a larger stack then I would have been forced to fold. I thought if he had the 8 then he had the 8 but I felt the all-in move was somewhat suspect especially coming from a short stack. A raise or re-raise would have made me cautious.

********** # 10 **************
pokerstars Game #18690711194: Hold'em No Limit ($0.01/$0.02) - 2008/07/09 - 06:15:40 (ET)
Table 'Polana' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: A.P.S.587 ($5.88 in chips)
Seat 2: bb_rule ($2 in chips)
Seat 4: Budar16 ($1.31 in chips)
Seat 5: b13395 ($0.44 in chips)
Seat 6: light65536 ($5.96 in chips)
A.P.S.587: posts small blind $0.01
bb_rule: posts big blind $0.02
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to light65536 [Tc Th]
Budar16: calls $0.02
b13395: calls $0.02
light65536: raises $0.08 to $0.10
A.P.S.587: calls $0.09
bb_rule: folds
Budar16: calls $0.08
b13395: calls $0.08
*** FLOP *** [8d 4s 8h]
A.P.S.587: checks
Budar16: bets $1.21 and is all-in
b13395: folds
light65536: calls $1.21
A.P.S.587: folds
*** TURN *** [8d 4s 8h] [Jd]
*** RIVER *** [8d 4s 8h Jd] [5s]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Budar16: shows [9c As] (a pair of Eights)
light65536: shows [Tc Th] (two pair, Tens and Eights)
light65536 collected $2.74 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $2.84 | Rake $0.10
Board [8d 4s 8h Jd 5s]
Seat 1: A.P.S.587 (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 2: bb_rule (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: Budar16 showed [9c As] and lost with a pair of Eights
Seat 5: b13395 folded on the Flop
Seat 6: light65536 (button) showed [Tc Th] and won ($2.74) with two pair, Tens and Eights

 

[robwhufc]

Yup, you've analysed it yourself. He's bet too much and made it obvious he didn't have the 8. $1.20 into 3 opponents to win 40 cent pot? There is a reason these players are playing micro limit!