re: Poker & $100 NLHE 6-max: Spew contest? Fundamental theorem of poker spot?
Originally Posted by c0rnBr34d
From a fundamental theorem of poker perspective, if we can see V's hand, aren't we playing it in similar fashion? I'd be fine if we got shown TT here but how does this guy stack off with bottom pair in a cold 4 bet pot over 3 streets? I've never in my life called a cold 4 bet OOP with A3o, and I've had some pretty spewy hands. V was legit in the tank every street post flop and it obviously wasn't Hollywood. I may have given up if we got flatted more quickly.
H - VP 29 / PR 20 / 3B 6 / AF 2 / 4B 33 (88 hands, so may look a bit more drastic to V)
V - VP 54 / PR 25 / 3B 0 / AF 4 (24 hands)
|
|
I think his play doesn't make sense at all preflop. He is playing a 4betpott oop without initiative. He will occasionally do this with AA, but any call in that spot is a bad play as he will be playing at a massive disadvantage postflop. Not to speak of all the equity your 4betbluffs just gained on him.
As for postflop OTR I'd be checking back here most of the time, since you have decent showdownvalue and as the board doesn't affect the ranges too much, you won't have FE. Other than that I'd play the same.
__________________
Poker is a game of skill against your opponents luck
|