V
vwls
Rock Star
Silver Level
UTG: 69 BB
UTG+1: 326 BB
Player (MP): 316 BB
CO: 100 BB
Opponent (BTN): 37.5 BB (VPIP: 50.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, hands: 2)
SB: 100.5 BB
BB: 67.5 BB
SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Player has A♣ K♦
fold, UTG+1 calls 1 BB, Player calls 1 BB, fold, BTN raises to 4 BB, fold, fold, fold, Player calls 3 BB
Flop: (10.5 BB, 2 players) T♣ A♠ Q♥
Player checks, BTN bets 6.5 BB, Player calls 6.5 BB
Turn: (23.5 BB, 2 players) 9♥
Player checks, BTN bets 27 BB and is all-in, Player calls 27 BB
River: (77.5 BB, 2 players) 4♠
Result:
My thoughts:
EDIT: I just realized that I had no stats on this opponent, at the time this hand took place. I only had two hands on them. After 209 hands, they are 17/9. if anyone has any thoughts on how this played out read-less vs. if I had more information, that would be appreciated. I hold the same opinion, either way.
UTG+1: 326 BB
Player (MP): 316 BB
CO: 100 BB
Opponent (BTN): 37.5 BB (VPIP: 50.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, hands: 2)
SB: 100.5 BB
BB: 67.5 BB
SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Player has A♣ K♦
fold, UTG+1 calls 1 BB, Player calls 1 BB, fold, BTN raises to 4 BB, fold, fold, fold, Player calls 3 BB
Flop: (10.5 BB, 2 players) T♣ A♠ Q♥
Player checks, BTN bets 6.5 BB, Player calls 6.5 BB
Turn: (23.5 BB, 2 players) 9♥
Player checks, BTN bets 27 BB and is all-in, Player calls 27 BB
River: (77.5 BB, 2 players) 4♠
Result:
Player shows A♣ K♦ (One Pair, Aces)
(Pre 43%, Flop 15%, Turn 9%)
BTN shows T♥ T♦ (Three of a Kind, Tens)
(Pre 57%, Flop 85%, Turn 91%)
BTN wins 74 BB
(Pre 43%, Flop 15%, Turn 9%)
BTN shows T♥ T♦ (Three of a Kind, Tens)
(Pre 57%, Flop 85%, Turn 91%)
BTN wins 74 BB
This hand is from a while ago, and I found it while looking into a player that I hadn't seen at the Omaha tables, but that I had seen at NLHE tables. I do believe that I played this hand poorly, but I want to make sure I'm not being results-oriented. I'm not sure what I was thinking at the time, but this player's hands from around that time show that he was very aggressive with big hands like sets. Other than those, he was all-in with TPTK at best and A-high at worst, once even pre-flop shoving AKs. That said, they are also very tight. Despite their sometimes overly aggressive plays, they are always in with good made hands or good starting hands. Is their random spazzing off chips with A-high enough reason to call them down here? The following is from my notes: "I think the first call was okay, but I could have folded, once they were all-in. Against a player who usually has a big hand when playing this aggressively, I can get out. Even though they are liable to get weird with Ace-high, that was vs. an opponent's aggression, whom they had some history with. They were cautious with a set on a wet board, so their big aggression here says big hand, to me. They are also very tight, so any big Ace hit two-pair, plus there are the set possibilities. This pot ended with almost 80 BB, which is way too much for me to be getting caught up w/ only TPTK."
I also just noticed that I limped AK. As I said, I don't remember what I was thinking, at the time. I may have leveled myself, thinking that my opponent was just being aggressive against my perceived weakness.
Again, I am not sure if I am being results-oriented or if my reasoning is even sound.
I also just noticed that I limped AK. As I said, I don't remember what I was thinking, at the time. I may have leveled myself, thinking that my opponent was just being aggressive against my perceived weakness.
Again, I am not sure if I am being results-oriented or if my reasoning is even sound.
EDIT: I just realized that I had no stats on this opponent, at the time this hand took place. I only had two hands on them. After 209 hands, they are 17/9. if anyone has any thoughts on how this played out read-less vs. if I had more information, that would be appreciated. I hold the same opinion, either way.